A comparative study of tumor-associated macrophages isolation in colorectal carcinoma by Ficoll-Hy-paque density gradient centrifugation and Percoll density gradient centrifugation
10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2015.09.004
- VernacularTitle:Ficoll 和Percoll法分离结直肠癌相关巨噬细胞的比较
- Author:
Fang YANG
;
Feifan WU
;
Xiaoyan WANG
;
Zhiyan HU
;
Zuguo LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Colorectal carcinoma;
Tumor associated macrophages;
Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation;
Percoll density gradient centrifugation;
Adherence separation
- From:
The Journal of Practical Medicine
2015;(9):1394-1398
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective Percoll density gradient centrifugation and Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient cen-trifugation, which are frequently-used methods for separation of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) from solid carcinoma were compared, in order to find an effective way to separate TAMs from colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Furthermore, we studied the best adherence time of separating macrophage among mononuclear cells. Methods specimens were collected from CRC patients , after digesting into single cells , TAMs were separated from the same specimen by 100% Ficoll, 35% percoll and 25% combined with 65% percoll respectively. After these pre-liminary separation, the collected cells were purified a second time by adherence separation. The purity of TAMs were detected by immunofluorescence. Results TAMs purity from Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation was 80.18%, statistically higher than that from Percoll density gradient centrifugations (54.33% and 10.93% re-spectively). Conclusion Compared to Percoll density gradient centrifugation, Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation is a more effective and simple way to isolate TAMs from colorectal carcinoma , suggesting it can be wildly used in clinical and basic medical research. 2-4 hours is the best adherence time for isolating macrophage.
