Effect of Aortic Arch Type on Technical Indicators in Patients With Carotid Artery Stent Implantation
10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2015.01.010
- VernacularTitle:主动脉弓解剖分型对颈动脉支架置入术技术指标的影响
- Author:
Songhe SHEN
;
Xiongjing JIANG
;
Hui DONG
;
Meng PENG
;
Zhixue WANG
;
Yubao ZOU
;
Yaxin LIU
;
Lei SONG
;
Huimin ZHANG
;
Haiying WU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Carotid artery stent implantation;
Aortic arch type;
Myla classiifcation
- From:
Chinese Circulation Journal
2015;(1):34-37
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To explore the effect of the aortic arch type on technical indicators in patients with carotid artery stent implantation.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 224 consecutive patients treated in Fu Wai hospital for unilateral carotid artery stent implantation from 2011-01 to 2012-12. We summarized the catheter category, type and the operating techniques including ① retracement, turn and insertion of the catheter, ② retracement, turn of catheter+the guidance of guide wire,③ retracement, turn of catheter+the guidance of guide wire+the supporting of another catheter, ④ using special graphic catheter+the guidance of guide wire+the supporting of another catheter. The procedural X-ray exposure time, dosage of contrast agent and operation related complications were recorded. According to Myla classiifcation, the aortic arches were divided into Myla I, Myla II and Myla III types.
Results: There were 7/224 (3.1%) patients with Myla I aortic arch, 113 (50.4%) with Myla II aortic arch and 104 (46.4%) with Myla III aortic arch. A total of 48/104 (46.2%) Myla III patients used special techniques (tech③, tech④), it was more than the patients with Myla I, (1/7,14.3%) and Myla II (17/113, 15.0%), P<0.01. The patients with Myla III aortic arch had the longer X-ray exposure time and used the higher dose of contrast agent, all P<0.01. The procedural success rate in patients with
Myla III was 96.2%, it was lower than those with Myla I (100%) and Myla II (100%), P=0.045. The procedural complication rate in patients with Myla III was 22.1%, it was higher than those with Myla I (0%) and Myla II (8.9%), P=0.007.
Conclusion: The aortic arch type is the important inlfuential factor for the techniques used in carotid stent implantation. There were more dififculties and complications for stent implantation in patients with Myla III aortic arch.
