Prevalence and Predictor Analysis of Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling in Patients With Primary Hypertension Combining Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2014.12.008
- VernacularTitle:原发性高血压伴左心室收缩功能障碍患者左心室逆重构的发生率及预测因素分析
- Author:
Yan HUANG
;
Xuefei WU
;
Changhong ZOU
;
Qiong ZHOU
;
Yuhui ZHANG
;
Rong LV
;
Jian ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Left ventricular reverse remodeling;
Primary hypertension;
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction;
Prevalence;
Predictors;
Medication
- From:
Chinese Circulation Journal
2014;(12):987-991
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To analyze the prevalence and predictor for left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) in patients of primary hypertension combining left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) with tailored medication.
Methods: A total of 118 consecutive patients admitted in our unit from 2010-08 to 2012-10 with the base line left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≤40%were enrolled. The demographic and clinical information with the findings of echocardiography at admission were collected. The patients were followed-up until 2013-12 or until the all cause death/cardiac transplantation. According to echocardiography, LVRR was deifned by 2 criteria at the same time:①the absolute elevation of
LVEF≥10%than base line and the follow-up LVEF≥50%,②the relative reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) index≥10%than base line and the follow-up LVEDD index≤27 mm/m2. LVRR prevalence with its base line predictor was investigated.
Results: The overall mean follow-up time was (23 ± 15) months, and 39/118 (33.1%) patients acquired LVRR as LVEF from the base line level (30.6 ± 6.8)%increased to the follow-up level (57.0 ± 4.9)%;LVEDD index from the base line level (31.6 ± 3.9) mm/m2 decreased to the follow-up level (24.4 ± 1.9) mm/m2, all P<0.01. The average time length for reaching LVRR was (11 ± 9) months, and 27/39 (69.2%) patients reached LVRR within 12 months. There were 79 patients not reached to LVRR, while their LVEF also from the base line level (28.6 ± 6.1)%increased to the follow-up level (39.0 ± 13.2)%;LVEDD index from the base line level (38.1 ± 5.6) mm/m2 decreased to the follow-up level (36.1 ± 6.9) mm/m2. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that the patients with the shorter duration of heart failure (HF) as>6 months vs≤6 months (OR=0.244, P<0.01), shorter QRS interval as≥120ms vs<120ms (OR=0.276, P<0.05) and the higher quartile of systolic blood pressure (SBP)/LVEDD index (OR=2.724, P<0.01) at admission were the independent predictors for LVRR.
Conclusion:With tailored medication, about 1/3 of patients with hypertension combining LVSD could acquire LVRR, the patients with shorter duration of HF, shorter QRS interval and higher ratio of SBP/LVEDD index had more possibilities.
