Comparative experimental study of different administration methods for steroid-induced femoral head nec-rosis in rabbits
10.16571/j.cnki.1008-8199.2015.07.016
- VernacularTitle:经口腔深部灌注给药与传统给药方法的对比实验研究
- Author:
Fujun LI
;
Xiaolong WANG
;
Jianmin ZHAO
;
Yun ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Administration method;
Gavage administration;
Oral administration;
Rabbit;
Steroid-induced femoral head necrosis
- From:
Journal of Medical Postgraduates
2015;(7):745-749
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective The method of administration is one of the important factors influencing steroid-induced femoral head necrosis ( FHN) .From the perspective of administration compliance, time and persons needed, and pharmacodynamics, this study compared different administration methods for steroid-induced FHN in rabbits aiming to provide some experimental evidence for selec-ting correct methods of administration. Methods The steroid-induced femoral head necrosis rabbits ( New Zealand, male) were ran-domly divided into five groups according to the different administration methods of intervention:deep oral administration group (n=10), in-tragastric gavage administration group ( n =10 ) , free-drinking drug group (n=10) and model control group (n=5), blank control group (n=5), the administration compliance, administration time, mortal-ity, pharmacodynamic index of lipid content and empty lacunae rate were compared among deep oral administration group, intragastric ga-vage administration group, free-drinking drug group. Results Compliance effect size of deep oral administration group ( 1.78 ± 0.64) lower than intragastric gavage administration group (4.04 ±0.87) and free-drinking drug group (8.94 ±1.05) (P<0.01). Administration time among deep oral administration group ([0.94 ±0.02]min), intragastric gavage administration group ([9.47 ± 0.31]min) and free-drinking drug group ([889.50 ±235.38]min) overall comparison gradually increased (P=0.000), the differ-ence between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).At the 2 and 4 weeks, cholesterol, triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein of deep oral administration group, intragastric gavage administration group, free-drinking drug group compared with model control group and blank control group the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05) , and deep oral administration group com-pared with free-drinking drug group, the difference was also statistically significant ( P<0.05) .At the 2 weeks, empty lacunae rate of deep oral administration group ([15.44 ±2.68]%), intragastric gavage administration group ([15.02 ±3.34])%), free-drinking drug group ([16.72 ±4.06]%) compared with model control group ([18.59 ±3.12]%) and blank control group ([10.82 ± 2.76]%, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).At the 4 weeks, empty lacunae rate of deep oral administration group ([18.53 ±3.26]%), intragastric gavage administration group ([18.85 ±3.17]%), free-drinking drug group ([20.41 ±4.18]%) compared with model control group ([24.66 ±3.74]%) and blank control group ([11.37 ±2.23]%), the difference was also sta-tistically significant ( P<0.05 ) . Conclusion Compared with traditional methods of administration, deep oral administration has better compliance, shorter administration time, and similar to intragastric gavage administration in pharmacodynamics, but more effec-tive than free-drinking drug administration, and it is a new and effective method of administration.
