Clinic significance of four clinical scoring systems in evaluating prognosis of acute pancreatitis
10.11958/j.issn.0253-9896.2015.02.028
- VernacularTitle:四种评分系统对急性胰腺炎预后评估价值的比较
- Author:
Jimin ZHENG
;
Juncha GAO
;
Hongwei ZHAO
;
Yuzhen WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
pancreatitis;
acute disease;
prognosis;
APACHEⅡscore;
BISAP score;
Ranson’s score;
Balthazar CT se-verity
- From:
Tianjin Medical Journal
2015;(2):217-220
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinic significance of four clinical scoring systems in evaluating prognosis of acute pancreatitis: bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis(BISAP), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHEⅡ), Ranson’s scoring system, computed tomography severity index (CTSI) in AP. Methods Patients visited our clinic with AP (n=114) in recent 2 years were retrospectively analyzed. BISAP and APACHEⅡscores were obtained at 24 hours after admission; Ranson ’s score was obtained at 48 hours after admission and CTSI are obtained was obtained at 72 hours after admission. Results of four scoring system were compared under different causes and different severity of the dis?ease. Correlation between BISAP score and the other three scores were analyzed and the predicative value of all four scoring systems for severity of AP and death were also compared. Results The mean values of four scoring systems show no signifi?cant difference in AP patients with different etiology (P>0.05). The BISAP score is positively correlated with APACHE-Ⅱ, Ranson ’s score and CTSI score (P<0.01). The four scoring systems all present good predictive value on the severity of AP and death (P<0.01). Conclusion The four scoring systems can all be applied to grading and prognosis for AP of various causes. BISAP is a simple, prompt, economical scoring system in clinical practice.
