Triple-negative and Non-triple-negative Breast Cancer:A Comparison of Mammography and Ultrasonography
10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2014.10.002
- VernacularTitle:三阴性乳腺癌与非三阴性乳腺癌的钼靶与超声比较
- Author:
Hui ZHANG
;
Litao SUN
;
Bo GAO
;
Xiaoying CHENG
;
Lei ZHANG
;
Shumei ZHENG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Breast neoplasms;
Mammography;
Ultrasonography,mammary;
Pathology,surgical;
Female
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
2014;(10):725-729
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Purpose To compare the mammography and ultrasound imaging features of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-triple-negative breast cancer (NTNBC), and to improve TNBC diagnosis. Materials and Methods Using immunohistochemical staining technique, 387 patients with pathologically conifrmed breast cancer were divided into TNBC group (n=54) and NTNBC group (n=333). Mammography and ultrasound ifndings as well as pathological data were retrospectively reviewed. Results TNBC was associated with higher tumor grades. There were signiifcantly more grade III inifltrating ductal carcinomas and axillary lymph node involvement in TNBC group than in NTNBC group (χ2=47.009, P<0.001;χ2=4.658, P<0.05). On mammography, TNBC most frequently presented with a mass (n=37, 69.8%) and was less associated with microcalciifcations (n=10, 18.9%). TNBC masses were mostly round or oval (n=28, 62.2%) with circumscribed margin (n=16, 35.6%). Spiculated margins were rare (n=5, 11.1%). NTNBC most frequently presented as a mass with calciifcations (n=138, 42.1%), and was more irregular in shape (n=119, 46.5%). Spiculated margins were common (n=77, 30.1%). There was statistically signiifcant difference between these two groups in mass, microcalcification, shape and margin (χ2=24.618, 19.889, 32.605 and 21.102, P<0.001). On ultrasonograhy, TNBC most frequently presented as a mass (n=52, 96.3%) with less microcalciifcations (n=5, 9.3%). TNBC masses were more frequently round or oval (n=27, 51.9%) with circumscribed margins (n=25, 48.1%). Spiculated margins were rare (n=3, 5.8%). TNBC was less likely to show attenuating posterior echoes (n=5, 9.6%);NTNBC most frequently presented as a mass (n=318, 96.1%) with microcalcifications (n=135, 40.8%). NTNBC masses were more frequently irregular in shape (n=243, 76.4%) with spiculated margins (n=76, 23.9%). NTNBC was more likely to show attenuating posterior echoes (n=78, 24.5%). There was statistically signiifcant difference between these two groups in microcalciifcation, shape, margin and posterior echo (χ2=19.006 and 18.339, P<0.001;χ2=16.170 and 8.429, P<0.05). Conclusion TNBC demonstrates round or oval mass with circumscribed margin and is less likely to show attenuating posterior echoes on mammography and ultrasound with benign imaging features. NTNBC frequently presents as irregular mass with spiculated margin, and is more associated with microcalciifcations. These imaging ifndings are useful in early diagnosis of TNBC.
