Comparative analysis of whole mount processing and conventional sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens
10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2014.11.005
- VernacularTitle:根治性前列腺切除术后病理大切片与常规切片的对比分析
- Author:
Kun CHANG
;
Xiaoqun YANG
;
Chaofu WANG
;
Hualei GAN
;
Aihua ZHENG
;
Jun YANG
;
Bo DAI
;
Yuanyuan QU
;
Hailiang ZHANG
;
Guohai SHI
;
Yao ZHU
;
Dingwei YE
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Prostate cancer;
Whole mount technique;
Radical prostatectomy
- From:China Oncology
2014;(11):824-829
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Background and purpose:To perform whole mount technique in the diagnosis of the prostate cancer could provide orientation to the specimen. Whole mount technique has great value in pathologic diagnosis and morphological research. However, limited by the specimen-making technique, shortage of equipment and heavy workload, this technique has not been generally accepted in China. The aim of this study was to evaluate the signiifcance of whole mount technique in the diagnosis of the prostate cancer by comparing the clinical and pathological variables between whole mount patients and conventional ones after radical prostatectomy (RP).Methods:A total number of 229 patients’ whole mount RP specimens were recruited in the study from Dec. 2012 to Feb. 2014. The control group included 393 patients’ specimens which underwent conventional sampling from Jan. 2010 to Jun. 2012. We compared the clinical and pathological variables between the groups, including age, preoperative PSA level, methods of diagnosis, preliminary diagnostic Gleason score, clinical T stage, postoperative Gleason score, pathological T stage, positive surgical margin, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and pelvic lymph node metastasis.Results:Two groups shared similar preoperative parameters. Also there was no signiifcant difference between the whole mount and the conventional sampling groups in postoperative Gleason score, pathological T stage, extraprostatic extension and pelvic lymph node metastasis. However, positive surgical margin and seminal vesicle invasion rates were much higher in the whole mount group than the control one and both of the differences reached statistical signiifcance (26.2%vs 17.6%, 23.1%vs 17.0%;P=0.010, 0.025)Conclusion:After compared the clinical and pathological variables, we could conclude that whole mount technique has prevalence in the diagnosis of the positive surgical margin and seminal vesicle invasion compared with the conventional sampling technique. Thus, whole mount technique should be strongly recommended in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
