Comparison of efficacy of traditional open thyroid operation and minimally invasive laryngeal endoscopic thyroid operation
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2014.23.024
- VernacularTitle:传统开放式甲状腺手术与微创喉内镜甲状腺手术的疗效比较
- Author:
Junguang LIU
;
Yanling HU
;
Fangfang LIAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Thyroidectomy;
Endoscopy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2014;(23):3582-3583
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the curative effect and complication of traditional open thyroid operation and minimally invasive laryngeal endoscopic thyroid operation.Methods 80 cases with thyroid disease were randomly divided into group I and groupⅡof 40 cases in each group,the group Ⅰ received the minimally invasive laryngeal endoscopic thyroid operation, while the Ⅱ group was treated with traditional open thyroid operation.The operation time,intraoperative amount of bleeding,postoperative drainage,hospitalization time and complications of two groups were compared.Results The operation time,hospitalization time of groupⅠwere (63.1 ±0.2)min,(5.7 ±0.6)d, which were significantly shorter than those of the control group[(90.4 ±1.1) min,(8.4 ±0.2) d].Amount of bleeding,postoperative drainage volume after operation in groupⅠwere (19.2 ±0.9) mL,(30.4 ±2.6) mL,which were significantly less than those of the control group[(42.1 ±1.8)mL,(46.2 ±1.2)mL] (t=9.819,12.168, 11.182,9.928,all P <0.05);The incidence of postoperative complications of group Ⅰ was 2.5%,lower than 15.0%of groupⅡ,the difference was statistically significant between the two groups(χ2 =13.197,P <0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive laryngeal endoscopic thyroid operation has advantages in little trauma,short opera-tion time,rapid postoperative recovery.
