Biocompatibility of electrospun poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/polyethylene glycol nanofibrous scaffold with mouse neural stem cells
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.47.008
- VernacularTitle:静电纺丝聚乳酸复合物纳米纤维材料与小鼠神经干细胞的生物相容性
- Author:
Chang LIU
;
Limin RONG
;
Shangfu LI
;
Mao PANG
;
Yang YANG
;
Bin LIU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
biocompatible materials;
neural stem cels;
mice;
cel proliferation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2014;(47):7585-7590
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) scaffold is widely used in tissue engineering, but its poor cel adhesion ability and strong hydrophobicity limit its further development and application. OBJECTIVE: To study the biocompatibility of electrospun poly (lactide-co-glycolide)/polyethylene glycol (PLGA-PEG) nanofibrous scaffolds with mouse neural stem celsin vitro. METHODS:Neural stem cels were isolated from embryos of CD-1 mice at 15 embryonic days. Electrospinning was used to prepare PLGA and PLGA-PEG nanofibrous scaffolds. Scanning electron microscope was used for scanning observation of scaffolds. The 5th passage neural stem cels were seeded onto PLGA and PLGA-PEG scaffolds respectively, and culturedin vitro. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Interconnected porous network structure was observed in both two kinds of scaffolds under the scanning electron microscope. Fiber diameters and porosities of PLGA and PLGA-PEG scaffolds showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). Cel Counting Kit-8 detection showed neural stem cels grew wel on both two kinds of scaffolds and the absorbance value of two groups increased continuously with incubation time (1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 days). And there were statisticaly significant differences in the absorbance values between two groups at each time point (P < 0.05). Moreover, the cel adhesion rate was significantly higher in the PLGA-PEG group than in the PLGA group at 3, 6, 9 hours of culture (P < 0.05). Hoechst 33342 staining showed normal morphology and quality of the nuclei, and significantly more cels were observed in the PLGA-PEG group than the PLGA group (P < 0.05). Under the scanning electron microscope, compared with the PLGA scaffold, the PLGA-PEG scaffold was better for growth and matrix secretion of neural stem cels. In conclusion, PLGA-PEG nanofibrous scaffolds prepared by electrospinning are safe, non-toxic and suitable for neural stem cels growth with wel biocompatibility, appropriate aperture and porosity.
