The comparsion of clinical effect in different materials dentures in repaired of teeth
10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2014.22.018
- VernacularTitle:三种不同材料支架义齿对临床修复效果的影响
- Author:
Qin SU
;
Ping XU
;
Song JIN
;
Qianchao HAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Dentures,overlay;
Dental pulp;
Retentionforce;
Chewingeffciency
- From:
The Journal of Practical Medicine
2014;(22):3598-3600
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effect of different materials dentures in repaired of teeth. Methods A retrospective analysis of 570 patients with framework removable partial dentures , which were divided into the Vitallium 2000 group, the pure titanium group and the Co-Cr alloy group randomly from Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2012 in our hospital. Compare the clinical effect of three groups. Results The emplacement rate (χ2=10.283,P<0.05)and the 2-week adjust rate (χ2=16.262,P<0.05)of three groups were statistical different significantly. The incidence rate of denture stomatitis(χ2=12.773,P<0.05),the masticatory efficiency(t=8.194,P<0.05)and the incidence rate of adverse reactions (χ2= 6.028,P < 0.05)of three groups were statistical different significantly. The patients′satisfaction (χ2=2.191,P>0.05)of three groups weren′t statistical different significantly. The degree of comfort(χ2= 6.827,P < 0.05),the speech satisfaction(χ2= 6.002,P < 0.05) and the chewing speech satisfaction (χ2=5.838,P<0.05)three groups were statistical different significantly. Conclusion The clinical effect of the Vitallium 2000 group is better of weight , strength and stability than other groups. The Vitallium 2000 frame removable partial denture is nontoxic , fastness and no peculiar smell , which could be ensure the aesthetics , the degree of comfort and improve the masticatory efficiency , worthy to recommend its clinical use.
