Comparative study of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for elderly patients with gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-9026.2014.09.013
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜联合内镜治疗老年人胃部胃肠道间质瘤的效果
- Author:
Hua YANG
;
Gang XIAO
;
Xinping ZHOU
;
Guoju WU
;
Gang ZHAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors;
Laparoscopes;
Gastroscopes
- From:
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
2014;33(9):973-975
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the feasibility,safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for elderly patients with gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).Methods 54 cases with GIST aged 65 years and over in Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery in Beijing Hospital from Dec.2008 to Dec.2012 were selected.31 cases underwent LECS and 23 cases underwent open surgery.Clinical data including operation time,intraoperative blood loss,complications,tumor size,length of incision,postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time,postoperative in hospitalization and follow up data were retrospectively analyzed in patients.Results There were 17 males and 14 females in the LECS group,and the mean age was (72.8±5.9)years.29 patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted partial gastrectomy,and 2 cases underwent laparoscopicassisted endoscopic dissection in LECS group.All operations were successful with no conversion to open surgery and death.There were 13 males and 10 females in the open surgery group,and the mean age was(73.3±6.1)years.The mean operation time was longer in LECS group than in open surgery group [(120.6±32.8) min vs.(86.3±33.5) min].The mean intraoperative blood loss,mean tumor size,mean length of incision,mean time of gastrointestinal function recovery,mean postoperative hospitalization were less or smaller in LECS group than in open surgery group [(40±23.4) ml vs.(130±65.6) ml,(2.3±1.2)cm vs.(3.6 ±1.8)cm,(3.6±1.1) cm vs.(14.4±3.5) cm,(47.7± 10.4)h vs.(61.4±11.9)h,(5.1±2.3)d vs.(7.2±2.5)d,respectively,t=3.192,1.831,5.212,2.014,3.519,P=0.002,0.012,0.000,0.015,0.001].According postoperative tumor risk assessment,13 cases were at very low risk,15 cases at low risk and 3 cases at middle risk in LECS group; 4 cases were at very low risk,14 cases at low risk and 5 cases at middle risk in open surgery group.The risk degree was lower in LECS group than in open surgery group (x2 =5.63,P=0.017).During a follow-up of 5 53 months,death without GIST was found in 5 patients in LECS group and 4 cases in open surgery group.Hepatic metastasis was found in 1 case in open surgery group.Conclusions LECS is a safe and feasibility alternative approach for elderly patients with gastric GISTs.It has more minimal invasion,fast recovery and satisfaction with short term outcomes as compared with conventional open surgery.
