Comparison of different approaches of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large renal cell carcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2014.09.002
- VernacularTitle:不同入路腹腔镜手术治疗大体积肾癌的对照研究
- Author:
Weifeng XU
;
Hanzhong LI
;
Zhigang JI
;
Guanghua LIU
;
Yushi ZHANG
;
He XIAO
;
Xuebin ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Renal cell carcinoma;
Laparoscopy;
Retroperitoneal
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2014;35(9):645-649
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large renal cell carcinoma (＞7 cm) between retroperitoneal approach and transperitoneal approach.Methods From Jan 2008 to Dec 2013,the data of 68 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large renal tumor(＞7 cm) in our hospital were reviewed.There were 41 male patients and 27 female patients,whose age ranged from 43 to 73 (mean 58.4t6.9) years old.The size of tumor was between 7.0 to 12.5 cm (mean 8.9± 1.1 cm).Left renal tumor was found in 37 patients and right renal tumor in 31 patients.Clinical stages of the tumors were T2 to T3.All patients were undergone the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy,including retroperitoneal approach in 42 cases (observation group)and transperitoneal approach in 26 cases (control group).The exclusive criteria included inferior vena cava tumor thrombus,lymphatic or distant metastasis,previous operation history in the same region,multiple tumors.There were no significant differences in the age,gender,tumor size and location within two groups (P＞0.05).The perioperative indexes and oncological outcomes,such as operation time,blood loss,incidence of blood transfusion,incidence of SIRS,postoperative hospital stay,complications and follow-up results,were collected and compared between two groups.Results Conversion occurred in two cases from observation group and one case from control group.Operative time in observation group was significantly shorter than that in control group (114.9±24.4 min vs.131.2±29.9 min,P＜0.05).Bowel function recovered more rapidly in observation group than in control group (1.7±0.6 d vs.2.2±0.6 d,P＜0.05).However,the estimated blood loss,the incidence of blood transfusion,the postoperative hospital stay,the incidence of SIRS and perioperative complications showed similar results in the 2 groups (P＞0.05).The histopathological examination confirmed renal cell carcinoma in all cases.Observation group included 35 pT2 stage and 7 pT3a stage cases,while control group consisted of 21 pT2 stageand 5 pT3a stage cases.The follow-up duration ranged from 4 to 38 months (mean 17 months).Mean overall survival were 17.1 months in observation group and 18.7 months in control group.Progression free survival time was 15.7 months in observation group and 17.1 months in control group.Cox survival analysis showed that only pre-operative stage of the tumor were independent risk factor for the survival time (P=0.018) and progression free survival time (P=0.020),while the operative approach was not the independent risk factor (P=0.298,0.314).Conclusions For large renal tumors (＞7 cm),laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was safe and feasible.Compared to the transperitoneal approach,retroperitoneal approach cost less operative time and faster bowel recovery.But the operation approach is not an independent risk factor for the survival time and progression free survival time.
