Comparative analysis of effect of two kinds of biological agents in volume-reduced bullae
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2014.20.005
- VernacularTitle:两种不同生物学制剂在肺大疱减容术中的应用效果比较
- Author:
Huifang CUI
;
Xujun CHEN
;
Wenqiao HUANG
;
Yi SHU
;
Yiqun WU
;
Jianlong HUANG
;
Huimin CHEN
;
Ye LU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Pulmonary bulla;
Lung volume reduction surgery;
Biological agents;
Security
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2014;(20):3054-3056
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To retrospectively analyze the effect of two kinds of biological agents in volume -re-duced bullae .Methods 11 patients who suffered from bullae were operated under large C-arm locating ,and infused two kinds of biological agents through micro catheter of fibreoptic bronchoscopy .All of them were randomly divided into the two groups .The biological agents in group A were fibrinogen and diluent thrombin , and that of group B was Porcine Fibrin Sealant Kit .In group A,the micro catheter with diameter of micro thread less than 1.2mm was placed in bullae through fibreoptic bronchoscope ,and then the 2mL lidocaine,5 ml fibrinogen,and double of 500u diluent thrombin were inproperorder injected through micro catheter .In group B,the Porcine Fibrin Sealant Kit was injected at the same method,and then the suspension fluid was exacted .The operation time was recorded ,and then the clinical efficacy and incidence rate of complications were compared .Results The operation time of group A was 5-15 minutes, and that of group B was 6-20 minutes.For all the patients ,4 cases were totally effective ,2 cases were significantly effective,and 2 cases were totally non-effective.The total effective rate was 81.82%(9/11).The incidence rates of common complications in group A and B were 52.38%(22/42),58.33%(14/24),respectively,the difference was not significant (χ2 =0.22,P>0.05).Moreover,there were no serious complications in all cases .Conclusion The security and effect of two kinds of biological agents might be well enough ,but in view of less cases ,they were worth to further popularized and applied in clinical practice .
