Comparison of the effects of different analgesia methods for artificial abortion
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2014.20.002
- VernacularTitle:不同镇痛方法用于人工流产术的效果比较
- Author:
Jianguang WANG
;
Haijian LIU
;
Chenhui HE
;
Shucan XIE
;
Xinjie ZHU
;
Yu CHEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Abortion,artificial;
Analgesia
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2014;(20):3044-3047
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To observe the clinical effect of multimodal analgesia for painless artificial abortion . Methods 150 cases of ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ pregnancy received painless artificial abortion operation ,no contraindication for all patients,were randomly divided into the five groups ,30 cases in each group,the blank control group (group S):do not use any analgesia measure ,intravenous injection of 0.9% sodium chloride 2mL preoperation;the fentanyl group ( F group ) :intravenous injection of fentanyl 1μg/kg preoperation ;the parecoxib group ( group P ) :intravenous injection of parecoxib sodium 40mg preoperation.The patients were given painless artificial abortion after injection the above drugs.Nerve block group ( N group):the implementation of painless induced abortion operation after sleep in patients with the cervical nerve block ,injection of 1%lidocaine 2 mL.Multimodal analgesia group (group M):intra-venous injection of parecoxib sodium 40mg,fentanyl 1μg/kg,then the implementation method the same as N group . The operation time,anesthesia onset time,recovery time,time of accurate orientation and additional dosage of propo-fol;incidence rate of artificial abortion syndrome ,the incidence rate of uterine contraction pain ,10min,30min,1h,6h pain scores after operation; adverse reaction;satisfaction score of analgesic effect postoperative 24h were observed. Results The additional dosage of propofol in the group S ,group F,group P,group N and group M were (78.45 ± 20.36)mg,(15.55 ±12.33)mg,(16.75 ±13.13)mg,(14.55 ±10.25)mg,(9.35 ±8.27)mg.The incidence rates of uterine contraction pain in the group S ,group F,group P,group N and group M were 30%,10%,10%,10%,0. Compared with group M ,the additional dosage of propofol and incidence rate of uterine contraction pain in the other four groups were significantly increased (t=3.05,1.82,1.84,1.78,χ2 =72.1,68.2,68.2,68.2,all P<0.05). Pain scores after operation 10min,30min,1h,6h in the group S were (6.6 ±1.5)points,(5.6 ±1.4)points,(4.6 ± 1.1)points,(3.6 ±1.4)points.Those in group F were (5.1 ±1.5)points,(4.3 ±1.1)points,(3.1 ±0.9)points, (2.8 ±0.8).Pain scores after operation 10min,30min,1h,6h in the group P were (4.6 ±1.5) points,(4.2 ± 0.9)points,(2.9 ±0.8) points,(2.7 ±0.6) points.Those in the group N were (4.5 ±1.5) points,(4.1 ± 0.8)points,(2.9 ±0.8)points,(2.6 ±0.5).Pain scores after operation 10min,30min,1h,6h in the group M were (2.2 ±0.8)points,(1.9 ±0.7)points,(1.5 ±0.5)points,(1.2 ±0.3)points.Compared with the group M,pain scores after operation 10min,30min,1h,6h in the other four groups were significantly elevated ( t=2.03,1.96,1.86, 1.84,1.98,1.82,1.80,1.76,2.05,1.99,1.95,1.86,2.06,1.88,1.82,1.76,all P<0.05).Compared with S group,postoperative 24h satisfaction score of analgesia in the group M was improved significantly ( t =1.98,P<0.05).Compared with group M,the incidence rate of nausea in the other four groups was increased significantly (χ2 =72.2,68.9,68.1,68.1,all P<0.05).Conclusion Multimodal analgesia method can greatly reduce artificial abor-tion postoperative pain ,reduce the adverse reactions ,improve patients'satisfaction score ,ensure the safety of operation .
