Association of pre-treatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios with re-sponse to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and clinical outcomes of cer-vical cancer patients
10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.20140456
- VernacularTitle:治疗前血小板和淋巴细胞比值与宫颈癌新辅助化疗疗效及预后的相关性
- Author:
Wenyu ZHOU
;
Jinchan CHEN
;
Ning HUI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
uterine cervical neoplasm;
neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio;
prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
2014;(16):1045-1048
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the predictive value of pretreatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios (PLRs) in response to neoad-juvant chemotherapy and prognostic outcome in patients with International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) Stag-es IB2-IIB cervical cancer. Methods:An investigation was conducted from January 2010 to December 2012 on 75 patients with FIGO Stages IB2-IIB cervical cancer, who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery in Changhai Hospital, Shanghai. A re-ceiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the best PLR cut-off value in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The relationships between the pretreatment variables and the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assessed in univariate and multivariate settings. The overall three-year survival rates were analyzed using the log-rank test and Cox regression mod-el. Results:The response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with PLR. At the threshold of 123.0, the PLR was 88.5%sensi-tive and 52.2%specific. Multivariate analysis showed that the low independent PLR predicted the response to neoadjuvant chemothera-py well. Based on the log-rank test, the three-year survival rate was lower in patients with PLR >123.0 than those with PLR <123.0 (59.8%vs. 82.4%), but no statistically significant differences were observed between them (P=0.116). Mono-factorial analysis showed that vascular invasion (a tumor that is>4 cm in diameter) and lymph node metastasis influenced the three-year survival rate. In the Cox regression model, only the lymph node metastasis was identified as an independent risk factor for poor prognosis (RR:5.375;95%CI:1.351-21.379; P=0.017). Conclusion: Pretreatment PLR is an easily measured, reproducible, and inexpensive marker of systemic in-flammation and thus shows a prognostic and independent predictive value for the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical can-cer. However, pretreatment PLR is not a clinically significant factor for the assessment of cervical cancer prognosis.
