The fracture resistance and stress distribution of all ceramic crowns with two types of finish line on maxillary central incisor.
- Author:
Tae Seok KI
1
;
Kyea Soon KIM
;
Jin Han LEE
;
Yu Lee KIM
;
Jin Keun DONG
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Korea. dong@wonkwang.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
All ceramic crown;
Fracture resistance;
Finish line
- From:The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2003;41(4):405-420
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this sudy was to compare the fracture resistance of the IPS Empress ceramic crown with 1.0mm width rounded shoulder, which is usually recommended in all ceramic crown, and 0.5mm width chamfer finish lines on the maxillary central incisor. MATERIAL AND METHOD: After 15 metal dies were made for each group, the IPS Empress all ceramic crowns were fabricated and cemented with resin cement(Bistite resin cement, Tokuyama Soda Co. LTD., Japan) on the metal die. The cemented crowns were mounted on the positioning jig and the universal testing machine(Zwick Z020, Zwick Co, Germany)was used to measure the fracture strength, with loading on the incisal edge. And also, three-dimensional finite element stress analysis was used to measure the stress distribution with the various types of the finish lines(1.0mm width rounded shoulder, 0.5mm width chamfer), the loading site(incisal edge, incisal 1/3), and the type of loading(concentration loading, distribution loading). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: 1. In the fracture resistance experiment according to the finish line, the mean fracture strength of rounded shoulder(876N) and the mean fracture strength of chamfer(882N) did not show any significant difference between each other(p<0.05). 2. The stress distribution of all ceramic crown in three dimensional finite element analysis showed concentration aspect at loading point and cervical area of labial surface. 3. In metal die, there were no differences in stress distribution between finish lines, but in natural teeth model, chamfer finish line showed higher stress than rounded shoulder finish line. 4. When force was loaded on the incisal edge, the stress was concentrated on the incisal edge and the cervical area of labial surface. When force was loaded on the incisal 1/3, the stress concentrated on the cervical area of labial surface and the cingulum area. 5. Generally, natural teeth model showed higher and various stress than the metal die.
