New-style bone holder versus reduction forceps in treatment of clavicular fracture
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.40.017
- VernacularTitle:新型持骨器与复位钳修复锁骨骨折的结果比较
- Author:
Zixin FU
;
Kaixiang LIU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
clavicle;
fracture;
internal fixators;
fracture healing;
fol ow-up studies
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2014;(40):6495-6500
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:The current fixation methods for clavicle fracture are mainly anatomy plate or reconstruction plate. The specific devices for maintaining fracture alignment and fixation are rarely reported. The majority of physicians prefer reduction forceps to maintain fracture alignment and retain plate for internal fixation. However, reduction forceps have many disadvantages, such as large damage, instable fixation and difficult to bend or mould plates.
OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical effect of new-style bone holder and reduction forceps in treatment of clavicular fractures.
METHODA total of 75 patients with clavicular fractures were recruited from Department of Orthopedics, Huai’an First Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, between December 2011 and December 2013. The involved patients were randomly divided into two groups, new-style bone holder (39 cases) and reduction forceps (36 cases). In new-style bone holder group, the wounds were opened and reduced using reduction forceps, then new-style bone holder was applied to maintain fracture alignment and internal fixation;in reduction forceps group, the wounds were opened and reduced using reduction forceps, then reduction forceps was applied to maintain fracture alignment and internal fixation. The length of incision, the time of operation, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time and clinical efficacy in two groups were compared.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Al cases were fol owed up for over half a year. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the length of incision (P>0.05). The new-style bone holder group was obviously better than reduction forceps group in the time of operation, intraoperative blood loss and fracture healing time, with significant difference (P<0.01). The clinical efficacy was significantly higher than reduction forceps group. Experimental findings indicate that, new-style bone holder is characterized by simple operation, few trauma, stable fixation, short operation time, and rapid fracture healing.
