Analysis of cranial nerve injury after carotid endarterectomy
11.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2014.08.005
- VernacularTitle:颈动脉内膜切除术后脑神经损伤的分析
- Author:
Tao HONG
;
Gang SONG
;
Yanfei CHEN
;
Yabing WANG
;
Yan MA
;
Liqun JIAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Carotid endarterectomy;
Cranial nerve injury;
Learning curve
- From:
Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
2014;(8):411-414
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objectives To analyze the incidence of cranial nerve injury in patients after receiving carotid endarterectomy ( CEA) in a single-center and to investigate its correlation with surgical experiences. Methods The clinical data of patients underwent CEA at Beijing Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University from January. 2001 to December 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. Cranial nerve injury was assessed at day 7 after procedure according to the clinical symptoms,and they were followed up at 1,3,6, and 12 months. The incidence of permanent cranial nerve injury was evaluated. The incidences of permanent cranial nerve injury were further analyzed at two time periods ( from January 2001 to September 2011 and from October 2011 to December 2013 ) . Results ( 1 ) A total of 598 consecutive patients treated with CEA were enrolled,and 15 (2. 5%) of them had cranial nerve injury,including 2 (0. 3%) facial nerve injury,7 (1. 2%) hypoglossal nerve injury,and 6 (1. 0%) vagus nerve injury. Only 1 case (0. 2%) did not recover completely at 6 months after procedure. ( 2 ) The patients with cranial nerve injury were 10 (3. 2%,10/308) and 5 (1. 7%,5/290) respectively from January 2001 to September 2011 and from October 2011 to December 2013). There was no significant difference (P < 0. 05). Conclusion The incidence of cranial nerve injury was low after CEA,and most patients could recover completely. The increased surgical experiences did not show the reduction of cranial nerve injury rate evidently after CEA.
