A comparative study of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound assisted prostate biopsy and system-ic prostate biopsy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2014.07.012
- VernacularTitle:经直肠超声造影辅助前列腺穿刺活检与前列腺系统穿刺活检的比较研究
- Author:
Fan ZHANG
;
Wei WANG
;
Shiwei ZHANG
;
Huibo LIAN
;
Haifeng HUANG
;
Hongqian GUO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Prostate cancer;
Ultrasound;
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound;
Prostate needle bi-opsy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2014;(7):514-517
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the advantages of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound assis-ted prostate biopsy by comparing with systemic prostate biopsy . Methods From Jan.2010 to Dec.2011, 213 cases were selected randomly.Patient's mean age was 71.0±8.9 (54-83) years.Their PSA level was 22.5±19.4 (4.1-150.0) μg/L.The positive rates of DRE and transrectal ultrasound were 55.9%( 119/213) and 37.6%(80/213).This group of patients were biopsied according to transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound assisted prostate biopsies ( experimental group ) .During the same period , another 218 cases were selected randomly.Patient′s mean age was 65.0±9.1 (36-94) years.Their PSA level was 23.3±18.9 (4.6-147.0) μg/L.The positive rates of DRE and transrectal ultrasound were 57.3%( 125/218 ) and 38.1%(83/213).This group of patients were biopsied according to systemic prostate biopsy (control group).The data of two groups were compared to find out the advantages and disadvantages of transrectal contrast -en-hanced ultrasound assisted prostate biopsy . Results Comparing these two groups , the positive rates of prostate cancer in experimental group and control group were 38.0%(81/213) and 34.9%(76/218), with no statistically significance ( P>0.05); the numbers of cores were 9.5 and 12.0, with statistically signifi-cance (P<0.05);the positive rates of single needle were 18.2%(369/2 025) and 11.5%(301/2 616), with statistically significance (P<0.05); and the mean Gleason scores were 7.1 and 6.6, with statistically significance (P<0.05). Conclusions The efficiency of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound assisted prostate biopsy is higher than systemic prostate biopsy .Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound assisted prostate biopsy can be considered as a new option for prostate biopsy .
