Comparison of different operation methods for the treatment of localized and high risk prostate cancer
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2014.09.010
- VernacularTitle:不同手术方式治疗局限性高危前列腺癌的比较研究
- Author:
Da CHEN
;
Yifu YAN
;
Ming XIA
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Prostate cancer;
Radical prostatectomy;
Laparoscope;
125I
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2014;35(9):672-675
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare clinical efficacy and complications of three operation methods for treating the localized and high risk prostate cancer.Methods From July 2006 to July 2010,102 cases with localized and high risk prostate cancer were included in the study.Among them,51 cases received open radical prostatectomy (Group A).Their characters included aged (63.7±7.9),PSA (31.8±6.6) μg/L,Gleason scores (8.5±0.5).In this group,T2c stage was diagnosed in 38 cases and T3a stage in 13 cases.32 cases received laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(Group B).Their characters included aged (64.4± 8.3),PSA (29.9±5.2) μg/L,Glcason scores (8.7±0.4).In this group,T2c stage was diagnosed in 21 cases and T3a stage in 11 cases.19 cases received 125I implantation (Group C).Their characters included aged (61.4± 7.4),PSA (30.6±.5.7)μg/L,Gleason scores (8.6±0.6).T2v stage was found in 8 cases and T3a stage in 11 cases.Operation time,amount of bleeding,hospitalization time,drainage time,gastrointestinal function recovery time,medical expenses and survival and recurrence rate in 1 year,3 years,5 years were compared within those groups.Results Operation time in three group were (232.6±38.4) min,(186.3±31.4) min,(35.4±14.6) min,respectively.Amount of bleeding in three group were (413.6±132.4) ml,(273.9± 77.4) ml,(19.4±4.4) ml,respectively.Hospitalization time in three group were (20.9±3.7) d,(15.6± 2.2) d,(6.4±2.6) d respectively.Drainage time in three group were (8.3±1.8) d,(7.5±0.9) d,(3.2± 0.8) d,respectively.Gastrointestinal function recovery time in three group were (4.1 ±0.6) d,(3.2± 0.4) d,(0.4±0.1) d,respectively.Medical expenses in three group were (23±4) thousand yuan,(32±3) thousand yuan,(45t3) thousand yuan respectively.All those items exhibited the significantly statistical difference (P＜0.05).The survival and recurrence rates had no significant difference during the follow-up in three groups.Conciusions Compared to the open radical prostectomy and laparoscopic radical prostectomy,particle implantation for prostate cancer had advantages in minimally invasive,less bleeding,short operation time,fast recovery and protection for Intestinal function.
