Comparison of Ocular Biometry and Postoperative Refraction in Cataract Patients Between Lenstar(R) and IOL Master(R).
10.3341/jkos.2012.53.6.833
- Author:
Joong Won SHIN
1
;
Mincheol SEONG
;
Min Ho KANG
;
Hee Yoon CHO
;
Yoon Jung LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea. goddns76@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Lenstar LS900;
Ocular biometry;
Optical low coherence reflectometry
- MeSH:
Anterior Chamber;
Biometry;
Cataract;
Eye;
Humans;
Interferometry
- From:Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
2012;53(6):833-838
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To compare axial length, anterior chamber depth, and keratometric measurements of an optical low-coherence reflectometry device with those of other ocular biometry devices and evaluate the accuracy of predicting postoperative refraction. METHODS: A total of 32 eyes in 32 patients who received cataract surgery were included in the present study. The axial length, anterior chamber depth, and keratometry were measured by optical low-coherence reflectometry (Lenstar LS900(R)), partial coherence interferometry (IOL master(R)), and ultrasound. The SRK/T formula was used to calculate IOL power, and predictive error that subtracts predictive refraction from postoperative refraction was compared among ocular biometry devices. RESULTS: Axial length, anterior chamber depth, and keratometry had a strong correlation and demonstrated no statistically significant differences between Lenstar LS900(R) and other devices. The Bland-Altman plots showed a high degree of agreement between Lenstar LS900(R) and other devices. The mean absolute prediction errors in Lenstar LS900(R) and IOL master(R) were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The ocular biometric measurements and prediction of postoperative refraction using Lenstar LS900(R) were as accurate as IOL master(R) and ultrasound.