Treatment on postoperative pain of anal disease by ear-point taping and pressuring：118 cases clinical observation
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4246.2014.06.008
- VernacularTitle:耳穴贴压治疗肛门病术后疼痛118例疗效分析
- Author:
Liang YUAN
;
Yuming KOU
;
Guodong LI
;
Qi LI
;
Zifu HONG
;
Fei WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Postoperative pain of anal disease;
Analgesic;
Ear-point taping and pressuring
- From:
International Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
2014;(6):505-508
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of the treatment on postoperative pain of anal disease by ear-point taping and pressuring. Methods Using random number table method,118 patients with postoperative pain of anal diseases were divided into 5 groups, namely 26 cases of analgesia group treated by main ear-point, 20 cases of group one treated by analgesia compatibility ear-point, 22 cases of group two treated by analgesia compatibility ear-point, 27 patients of group three treated by analgesia compatibility ear-point, and 23 patients of control group. The main ear-point for analgesia included TF(4) and the sensitive point matching with diseased area;Based on the main ear-point, compatibility ear-point group one add to AT(4)、CO(18)、AH(6a);compatibility ear-point group two add to CO(7)、HX(2)、HX(5);compatibility ear-point group three add to AH(6a)、AT(4)、HX(5);and the control group was treated with oral indomethacin tablets. All five groups were treated for 30 min, and the clinical analgesic efficacy and safety were evaluated. Results Pain scores decreased rates of the main ear-point analgesia group, compatibility ear-point analgesia group one, compatibility ear-point analgesia group two, compatibility ear-point analgesia group three, and the control analgesia group at 10 min after treatment was (6.49±1.98)%, (5.90±1.52)%, (6.10±2.22)%, (6.64±2.25)%, and (7.61± 1.10)%respectively. Compared with the control group , the main ear-point analgesia group or the compatibility ear-point analgesia group one or the compatibility ear-point analgesia group two, the difference was significant (P<0.05) . At 30 min after treatment, integral reduce pain rate of the above groups was (0.45±0.23)%, (0.43±0.18)%, (0.42±0.19)%, (0.38±0.25)%, and (0.38±0.23)%, the difference was not statistically significant between the control group and the other four groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The effects of 10 min treatment of ear-point taping and pressuring treating postoperative pain of anal disease was significantly better than the control group,however the 30 min treatment did not show significant difference.
