Investigate on the correlations between the time of thoracic endovascular aortic repair and prognosis in patients with acute Stanford type B aortic dissection
10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2014.05.006
- VernacularTitle:急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层腔内修复治疗时机与预后的关系
- Author:
Jielian YANG
;
Dingcheng XIANG
;
Hua XIAO
;
Dandan PENG
;
Jinxia ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Aortic dissection;
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
2014;(5):300-303
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the correlations between the time of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and prognosis in patients with type B acute aortic dissection (AADB). Methods The clinical data of 156 AADB patients with TEVAR was retrospectively analyzed and divided into 3 groups according to the time from onset of symptom to TEVAR:less than seven days was deifned as group 1 (G1, n=87), seven days to fourteen days group 2 (G2, n=48);more than fourteen days was group 3 (G3, n=21). The status of aortic reconstruction at three months TEVAR, in-hospital mortalities, mean hospital expense and length of stay were compared among three groups. Results Before TEVAR, there was no signiifcant differences in the ratio of smallest true lumen diameter and largest false lumen diameter amony the three groups (0.47±0.33, 0.42±0.18, 0.47±0.27, respectively, P>0.05). At three months after TEVAR, the ratio of largest true lumen diameter and largest false lumen diameter among the three groups was signiifcantly greater in group 1 (1.76±0.51) than group 2(1.42±0.30) and group 3(1.34±0.34, P < 0.05), when there was no signiifcant difference between the later two groups. Complete aortic reconstruction (8 from group 1 and 4 from group 2) was achieved in 12 patients at 3 months after TAVAR. Eight patients died during hospitalization, 5 from visceral ischemic, 2 from proximal aortic dissection, one patient from sudden death. Compared with G3, the hospital expense of group 1 and group 2 was cut down about ￥20000. Length of stay was signiifcant greater in group 3 than in group 1 and group 2 (P<0.05). Conclusions Early TEVAR for AADB was safe and beneifcial for aortic reconstruct and reducing the hospital expense and length of stay.
