Comparison of operative effect between McKeown minimally invasive approach and the left chest-neck incision approach esophagectomy in mid-to-distal esophageal cancer
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2014.17.013
- VernacularTitle:食管胸中下段癌应用微创McKeown手术与常规左侧开胸路径食管切除术的疗效对比
- Author:
Dewang YU
;
Dongfang WANG
;
Yan WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Esophageal neoplasms;
Esophagectomy;
Thoracoscopes;
Laparoscopes
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2014;37(17):35-38
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the outcome between McKeown minimally invasive approach and left chest-neck incision approach esophagectomy in mid-to-distal esophageal cancer.Methods The clinical data of 148 patients with mid-to-distal esophageal cancer from January 2009 to October 2013 were analyzed retrospectively.Seventy-eight patients (observation group) were performed with McKeown minimally invasive approach esophagectomy and 70 patients (control group) were performed with left chest-neck incision approach esophagectomy.The peroperative period status,postoperative complications and lymph nodes transfer between two groups were compared.Results All the operations were performed successfully.One patient in control group was dead because of acute myocardial infarction.The blood loss in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group[(89.2 ± 40.7) ml vs.(361.6 ± 81.5) ml] (P ＜ 0.05),the number of lymph nodes harvested and lymph node of thorax were significantly higher than those in control group[(22.8 ± 5.6) lymph nodes vs.(15.7 ± 3.4) lymph nodes,(14.7 ± 4.6) lymph nodes vs.(9.1 ± 3.6)lymph nodes] (P ＜ 0.05),the hospital stay was significantly shorter than that in control group [(11.6 ± 3.5)d vs.(14.0 ±6.6) d] (P ＜0.05).There were significant differences between two groups with regard to pneumonia,atelectasis,pleural effusion and delayed gastric emptying [5.1％ (4/78) vs.12.9％ (9/70),3.8％ (3/78) vs.11.4％(8/70),2.6％(2/78) vs.10.0％(7/70),9.0％(7/78) vs.1.4％(1/70)] (P ＜0.05).The transfer rate at the side of right recurrent laryngeal,left recurrent laryngeal and upper mediastinal lymph node in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group(P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion McKeown minimally invasive approach esophagectomy is feasible and safe which has lower blood loss,lower respiratory complication,shorter hospital stay and more number of lymph nodes harvested.
