A follow-up study on laparoscopy-assisted and open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2014.06.005
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜辅助与开腹手术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效对比
- Author:
Jin HUA
;
Jianjun DU
;
Anhui WANG
;
Jipeng LI
;
Qingchuan ZHAO
;
Cheng FANG
;
Yongping YAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Stomach neoplasms;
Laparoscopy;
Gastrectomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Surgery
2014;29(6):421-424
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective This study was to compare surgical safety and oncologic adequacy of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) versus open gastrectomy (OG) for advanced gastric cancer.Methods 120 consecutive AGC patients undergoing LAG with D2 lymph node dissection between September 2005 to December 2009 were compared with 120 AGC patients undergoing OG during the same period.In each group,50 underwent distal gastrectomy,70 for total gastrectomy.Results There was no conversion to open surgery in LAG.The operative time was significantly longer in LAG than OG [(307 ± 84) min vs.(203 ± 52) min,t'=11.556,P ＜ 0.01].The estimated blood loss was significantly less in LAG group than OG group [(258 ± 78) ml vs.(318 ± 89) ml,t =5.550,P ＜ 0.01].The number of lymph nodes retrieved was(17 ±11) in LAG,(16 ±10)in OG (t =0.723,P＞0.05).All margins were tumor free in both groups.9 patients had the postoperative complication in LAG,8 patients in OG (P ＞ 0.05).Length of postoperative stay was significantly shorter in LAG than OG [(10.6 + 4.7) vs.(14.3 ± 2.9) days,t' =7.339,P ＜0.01].There was no mortality in both groups.The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate were comparable (47.6％ in LAG vs.42.8％ in OG,x2 =0.577,P ＞ 0.05) between the two groups.Conclusions This study suggested that laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy is safe and feasible in terms of surgical outcome and oncologic adequacy for advanced gastric cancer.
