Gastric carcinoma perfusion imaging parameters with the multislice spiral CT:the relationship between quantitative measurements and tumor angiogenesis
10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2014.05.019
- VernacularTitle:胃癌 MSCT 灌注成像与肿瘤血管生成关系的初步研究
- Author:
Huifang CAI
;
Guangqiang CHEN
;
Jianbing ZHU
;
Jianxin CHEN
;
Wei YANG
;
Yijiang HU
;
Jianping GONG
;
Junkang SHEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
gastric carcinoma;
computed tomography;
perfusion imaging;
tumor angiogenesis;
vascular endothelial growth factor;
microvessel density
- From:
Journal of Practical Radiology
2014;(5):790-794
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To assess the relationship between gastric carcinoma perfusion imaging parameters with the multislice spi-ral CT (MSCT)and the tumor angiogenesis(MVD,VEGF).Methods (1)33 patients with gastric cancer were carried on perfusion CT scanning in the suspected lesions,and compared with operation and histological result.MSCT perfusion parameters tumor,such as local blood flow (BF),blood volume (BV),mean transit time of contrast agent (MTT),permeability surface (PS),were recor-ded,and compared with clinical pathological data.(2)27 patients of 33 cases which CT perfusion plane matching with operation pa-thology specimens performed with tumor microvessel density (MVD),vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)monoclonal anti-body immunohistochemical examination of MVD,the most intensive areas of high power (×200 HP)field counted,and VEGF stai-ning positive judged.Results Achievement ratio of gastric carcinoma MSCT perfusion imaging was 84.85% (28/33).The average value of BF,BV,MTT and PS were 63.658 ± 18.305,7.5 1 1 ± 2.427,1 1.952 ± 4.325 and 31.81 7 ± 13.533,respectively,and MVD was 37.7 ± 11.1/200 HP (range:13-60).VEGF was positive in 16 cases,negative in 11 cases.Gastric carcinoma undifferentiated group perfusion parameter PS value (35.1 5 ± 12.74 )and MVD (40.53 ± 10.66 )were higher than the differentiation group (23.90 ± 12.71 and 31.13 ± 9.82 )(P < 0.05 ),but BF,BV,MTT not statistically significant;Differences of CT perfusion parameters and MVD were not significant statistically between invasive serosa and noninvasive ;PS value (36.65± 12.80)of lymph node metastasis was greater than without metastasis(22.70 ± 1 1.1 5 )(P <0.01 ),the other was no significant difference;TNM staging Ⅲ,Ⅳ phase group of BF value (69.56 ± 1 6.49),PS value (34.90 ± 12.80)and MVD value (40.74 ± 10.53)were higher than Ⅰ,Ⅱ Group (49.63 ± 1 5.04),(24.50 ± 13.13)and (30.63 ± 9.61)(P <0.01).Spearman correla-tion analysis in confidence (two tails)of 0.01 was statistically significant between MVD in tumor tissues and gastric cancer MSCT perfusion parameters of BF (r=0.404)and MTT (r=0.371),whereas BV and PS were no significance.The regression equation of MVD with BF and MTT:MVD =1 6.602+0.1 50XBF +0.967XMTT,model checking of F values was 6.62,P =0.003.Conclusion The gastric carcinoma multi-slice CT perfusion imaging parameters BF,MTT and MVD,VEGF(+)was positive correlation, MSCT perfusion imaging parameters reflects tumor VEGF positive expression of gastric carcinoma.
