Clinical comparison of different materials as posterior dental implants
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.12.009
- VernacularTitle:不同材料烤瓷冠在后牙种植修复中的对比
- Author:
Xi YAO
;
Yunsheng LI
;
Dongmei HU
;
Yongyu DAI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
dental implants;
dental al oys;
metal ceramic al oys;
tooth preparation,prosthodontic
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2014;(12):1858-1863
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Studies have shown that selection of implant crowns that directly impact the service life of implants and patient’s periodontal health is very important.
OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical effects of Lava zirconia crowns, goal-platinum al oy ceramic crowns and silver-pal adium al oy crowns supplemented by dental implants used in the single missing posterior tooth.
METHODS:Sixty patients with first molar missing (120 teeth) were divided into three groups and treated with Lava zirconia, goal-platinum al oy ceramic and silver-pal adium al oy crowns applied to the dental implants for posterior column defects. The clinical restorative effects of three prostheses were compared.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:During 6-48 months of fol ow-up, the gingival edge coloring, gingival margin microleakage, the color of prosthesis of Lava zirconia al oy ceramic crowns and gold-platinum al oy ceramic crowns were better than those of silver-pal adium al oy crowns, and the gingival edge coloring and the color of prosthesis of Lava zirconia al oy ceramic crowns were better than those of gold-platinum al oy ceramic crowns, while the gingival margin microleakage of gold-platinum al oy ceramic crowns was better than that of Lava zirconia al oy ceramic crowns. Silver-pal adium al oy crowns were lower than Lava zirconia ceramic crowns and gold-platinum al oy ceramic crowns in the fracture extent. But silver-pal adium al oy crowns had the highest gingival index, the worst gingival health and rapidest and most severe plaque formation. Therefore, Lava zirconia al-ceramic crowns and gold platinum al oy-porcelain crown are ideal prostheses for implant restorations. The former has better biocompatibility, and the latter shows better marginal adaptation.