Comparison Between Cervical and Extra-cervical Surgical Approaches for Endoscopic Thyroidectomy：a Randomized Controlled Study
10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2014.04.010
- VernacularTitle:颈部入路与颈外入路腔镜甲状腺手术的比较：前瞻性随机对照研究
- Author:
Chengliang WU
;
Gengzhen CHEN
;
Hui HAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Modified Miccoli surgery;
Breast areola approach;
Endoscopy;
Thyroidectomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
2014;(4):320-323
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the therapeutic effects between cervical and extra-cervical surgical approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy . Methods From October 2012 to December 2013, forty-four thyroid goiter patients were divided into two groups randomly .Group A underwent modified Miccoli endoscopic thyroidectomy ( n =20 ) and group B underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy via breast areola approach ( n=24 ) .The operative time , intraoperative blood loss , pain in 24 hours postoperatively , drainage volume , postoperative hospital stay , hospital cost , complication and cosmetic results between the two groups were compared . Results Compared with group B, group A had shorter operative time [(77.9 ±28.3) min vs.(97.9 ±30.0) min, t=-2.259, P=0.029], less intraoperative blood loss [(15.9 ±8.7) ml vs.(29.5 ±16.1) ml, t=-3.384, P=0.002], less pain in 24 hours postoperatively ( no pain, endurable pain , intolerable pain in group A and B were 15, 5, 0 and 7, 15, 2 cases respectively , Z=-3.066, P=0.002), less postoperative drainage volume [(31.7 ±10.3) ml vs.(57.0 ±14.6) ml, t=-6.511, P=0.000], but poorer cosmetic results (very dissatisfied, not satisfied, satisfied, comparatively satisfied, and very satisfied in group A and B were 1, 4, 5, 6, 4 and 0, 1, 4, 5, 14 cases respectively, Z=-2.723, P=0.006).There was no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay and hospital cost between the two groups (P>0.05).One case suffered transient hoarseness in group A and one case had trembling hand due to low calcium level in group B and both of them recovered 1 month after symptomatic treatment .No permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury , parathyroid injury or other complications occurred in both groups . Conclusions Cervical approach is minimally invasive and leads to good cosmetic results while extra-cervical approach causes bigger trauma but leads to better cosmetic results.Patients with high cosmetic reguest may choose endoscopic thyroidectomy via breast areola approach .
