Meta analysis of flexion, extension and rotation of wrist joint in the elderly with distal radius fractures after treatment
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.17.025
- VernacularTitle:老年人桡骨远端骨折治疗后腕关节屈伸及旋转活动的Meta分析
- Author:
Zhongwei LI
;
Gele JIN
;
Desheng YANG
;
Yi YANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
radius;
radius fractures;
internal fixators;
aged
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2014;(17):2770-2776
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:At present, it remains controversial whether open reduction plate fixation is needed for distal radius fracture in the elderly to restore anatomic reduction of imaging.
OBJECTIVE:To systematical y evaluate the curative effects of operative and nonoperative treatments for distal radius fractures in the elderly.
METHODS:We retrieved PubMed, Springer and Wanfang database using computer. Relevant English and Chinese journals of orthopedics were retrieved by hand. Al literatures on curative effects of operative and nonoperative treatments for distal radius fractures in the elderly were col ected. RevMan 5.0 software provided by Cochrane was used to statistical y analyze the data.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Six literatures were included, including two of randomized control ed study and four of retrospective cohort study. Meta-analysis results displayed that there were no significant differences in both groups in range of motion of wrist joint extension [mean difference (MD)=-0.87, 95%confidence interval (CI) (-3.31, 1.58), P=0.49], range of motion of wrist joint flexion [MD=-2.79, 95%CI(-6.47, 0.88), P=0.14], range of motion of wrist pronation [MD=-0.08, 95%CI(-1.49, 1.64), P=0.92], range of motion of supination [MD=-0.7, 95%CI(-3.52, 2.12), P=0.63] and the occurrence of complication [MD=1.35, 95%CI(0.71, 2.56), P=0.36]. The length of radius in the surgery group was similar to that of normal [MD=2.46, 95%CI(1.78, 3.15), P<0.01]. Ulnar inclination [MD=3.73, 95%CI(2.97, 4.48), P<0.000 01] and palmar tilt angle [MD=6.81, 95%CI(3.72, 9.90), P<0. 000 1] in the surgery group were close to that of normal. There are no significant differences in extension, flexion, pronation and supination activities of wrist and posttreatment complication between two groups. Operative treatment result is superior to that of nonoperative treatment in anatomic reduction.
