Optimal position of locking compression plate for proximal humeral fractures:choice of lateral deltoid splitting approach?
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.09.024
- VernacularTitle:锁定加压钢板置入肱骨近端骨折的最理想位置：选择肩外侧三角肌劈开入路？
- Author:
Licheng BAI
;
Shao GU
;
Ying XIONG
;
Bailian LIU
;
Feng ZHAO
;
Daxing WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
humeral fractures;
internal fixators;
blood loss,surgical;
treatment outcome;
recovery of function
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2014;(9):1453-1458
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Classical deltopectoral approach leads to a great injury to soft tissues. It is difficult to lay the steel plate on the lateral side. The steel plate is frequently laid on the anterolateral side of humerus. Fixed position is not ideal.
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the safety and feasibility of lateral deltoid-splitting approach in treatment of proximal humeral fractures.
METHODS:From August 2008 to August 2013, 114 patients with fracture of surgical neck of humerus, who were treated in the Department of Orthopedics, Yan’an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University in China, were enrol ed in this study. They were treated with locking compression plate, and assigned to deltoid splitting approach group and deltopectoral approach group (n=57). Surgical trauma, fracture healing, curative effects, functional recovery and Constant shoulder score were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Al patients were fol owed up for at least 8 months. Compared with the deltopectoral approach group, the proximal humeral fractures were healed as scheduled in the deltoid splitting approach group, and the anteflexion, abduction, shoulder lifting of the shoulder joint, and sensation of lateral skin of the upper arm were not impacted. No significant difference in Constant shoulder score was detectable between the two groups (P>0.05), which suggested that deltoid splitting approach for treating the proximal humeral fractures was safe and feasible. In addition, in accordance with the Neer’s classification system, the excellent and good rate in the deltoid splitting approach group (91%) was significantly higher than that in the deltopectoral approach group (75%) (P<0.05). Therefore, the deltoid splitting approach can be used as the first choice for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.
