Clinical analysis of endoscopic minimally invasive cholecystolithotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2014.06.007
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床对比分析
- Author:
Zhengwei SONG
;
Xiujiang YANG
;
Hao LONG
;
Qineng ZHANG
;
Hao XIE
;
Tianfu YANG
;
Xiuhong LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
laparoscopic;
choledochoscope;
gallstones;
endoscopic minimally invasive cholecystolithotomy
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2014;(6):658-660
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To discusses the clinical application value and safety of endoscopic minimally invasive cholecystolithotomy in gallstones treatment .Methods To retrospectively analyzes the clinical data of 94 patients with gallbladder stone from Feb .2010 to Feb .2013 ,and divided into endoscopic minimally invasive cholecystolithotomy (EMIC) group (46 cases) and laparoscopic chole-cystectomy (LC) group (48 cases) .Observed two groups of operation time ,intraoperative blood loss ,intraoperative bile duct inju-ry ,anal exhaust time ,postoperative hospitalization time ,bile reflux gastritis ,abdominal distention ,diarrhea ,common bile duct calculi and hospitalization expenses ,etc .Results Two groups of operation time ,hospitalization expenses ,length of hospital stay ,and intra-operative blood loss have no obvious difference(P>0 .05) ,in EMIC set ,the exhaust time ,postoperative bile duct calculi incidence , intraoperative bile duct injury ,bile reflux gastritis incidence and the incidence of abdominal distension ,diarrhea are significantly less than LC group (P<0 .05) .Conclusion The endoscopic minimally invasive cholecystolithotomy compared with laparoscopic chole-cystectomy had high security ,light pain ,quicker recovery ,less complications advantages .It has already achieved the purpose of min-imally invasive treatment ,while maintaining the integrity of bile duct and gallbladder function ,thus it is worthy of promoting .
