A comparative study of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of upper ureter caculi combined with renal intrarenal infection
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2014.04.025
- VernacularTitle:输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗输尿管上段嵌顿结石合并感染的对比研究
- Author:
Honglin CHENG
;
Chuang GUO
;
Xuming LI
;
Zongyong CHENG
;
Feng LI
;
Li ZHANG
;
Yuanzhong LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
ureteral calculi;
minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy;
ureteroscopic litripsy
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2014;(4):442-444
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the safety and efficiency of patients with impacted upper ureter calculus combined with renal intrarenal infection treated by ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy (URL ) and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) .Methods 126 cases of impacted upper ureteral calculi combined with renal intrarenal infection were treated in this hos-pita1 from July 2007 to July 2011 ,including 58 cases of URL ,68 cases of MPCNL .The success rate of primary lithotripsy ,stone-free rate ,postoperative adjuvant therapy ,operative time ,hospital stay ,incidence of postoperative complications and other data were analyzed .Results The success rate of group URL was 82 .76% (48/58) ,the success rate of group MPCNL was 100 .00% .The stone-free rate seven day after operation :URL was 62 .07% (36/58) ,MPCNL was 98 .53% (67/68)(P<0 .05) .The stone-free rate was 100 .00% in MPCNL group and 81 .03% in URL group one month After operation(P<0 .05) .In MPCNL group ,the rate of adjuvant ESWL was 1 .47% ,significantly lower than 37 .93% in URL group(P<0 .05) .In URL group the operative time (65 .34 ± 26 .72)min and hospital stay(4 .54 ± 1 .87)d were significantly shorter than those (96 .32 ± 30 .94)min and(7 .62 ± 1 .93)d in URL group(P<0 .05) .After the operation ,in MPCNL group ,6 patients developed high fever ,in URL group ,5 patients had high fever (P<0 .05) .Culture of blood after operation found 3 patients and 2 patients in MPCNL group and URL group were positive(P<0 .05) .There were no significant differences in the rates of hemoglobin decline between the two groups (P>0 .05) .Conclusion It has higher successful rate and stone-free rate in patients with upper ureter calculus combined with renal intrarenal infection by MPCNL than those treated by URL .The safety and efficency of the former is better that of the latter .MPCNL can be the first choice for the upper ureter calculus combined with renal intrarenal infection .
