Prevalence of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Jeong-Eup Area: Community-based Study.
- Author:
Tae Gyu CHUNG
1
;
Jinsoo CHUNG
;
Moo Song LEE
;
Hanjong AHN
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Benign prostatic hyperplasia;
Prevalence;
Voiding symptoms
- MeSH:
Asian Continental Ancestry Group;
Biopsy;
Consensus;
Digital Rectal Examination;
Humans;
Jeollabuk-do*;
Korea;
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms;
Male;
Prevalence*;
Prostate;
Prostatic Hyperplasia*;
Prostatic Neoplasms;
Prostatism;
Quality of Life;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1999;40(1):52-58
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: There is no consensus about a definition of benign prostatic hyperplasia, but there are various definitions based on a combination of clinical parameters used to describe the properties of BPH: symptoms of prostatism, increase of prostate volume, and bladder outlet obstruction. The prevalence of clinical BPH in Asian was believed to be lower than Caucasian. The lower urinary tract symptoms associated with BPH in Korea was reported by some authors and it was similar to the results of other studies in western countries. We report the prevalence of BPH in Korean men through a community-based study in Jeong-Eup county, Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 653 men aged 50 and over in Jeong-Eup area, Korea was randomly selected for determination of the prevalence of BPH. The definition of BPH in this study was combination of moderate(8-19) to severe(>19) I-PSS, enlargement of the prostate over 30gms on digital rectal examination by one board certified urologist, and decreased peak flow rate below 15ml/sec. Men with abnormal digital rectal examination(DRE) and elevated serum prostate specific antigen(PSA) above 3.5ng/ml were undergone sextant prostate biopsy to exclude the prostate cancer. RESULTS: I-PSS questionnaires were completed in 431 men and the response rate was 66.1%. Based on I-PSS, 162 men(37.6%) had moderate symptoms and 51 men(11.9%) severe symptoms. Of 213 men with moderate to severe symptoms, 35.7% had enlarged prostate by DRE, and 63.1% decreased flow rate. The prevalence of BPH by the definition in this study was 4.3% in their fifties, 13.2% in sixties and 16.3% in seventies and over eighty(overall, 11.1%). The population-adjusted prevalence of BPH in Korean men aged 50 and over was 8.7%. A good correlation was found between the total symptom score and the quality of life score that is included in the I-PSS. CONCLUSIONS: Men with moderate to severe I-PSS was 49.5%, which was similar to the results from other studies in Caucasian and Japanese. The prevalence of BPH in Korea by aforementioned definition was 8.7%, which seems to be lower than Caucasian. This results suggest that approximately 1,600,000 Korean men had moderate to severe urinary symptoms and 300,000 clinical BPH by the definition in this study.
