Summary of the 2012 national autoantibody testing quality control and comparison with the past 9 years
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-7480.2014.03.006
- VernacularTitle:2012年全国多中心自身抗体检测质量控制调查及十年结果比较
- Author:
Haihong YAO
;
Rulin JIA
;
Yuan JIA
;
Zhanguo LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Autoantibodies;
Quality control;
Immunology;
Data collection
- From:
Chinese Journal of Rheumatology
2014;18(3):164-169
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the current national situation of autoantibody test in order to improve the quality of autoantibodies test.Methods Hospitals or departments in the whole country participated voluntarily or on invitation.Fifteen samples in total were distributed double-blindly,and autoantibodies including anti-nuclear antibody (ANA),anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody,anti-extractable nuclear antigens (anti-ENA),anti-citrulline antibody (anti-CCP),anti-mitochondria antibody (AMA) and anti-smooth muscle antibody (ASMA) were tested in 6 samples.The samples were used for AMA and ASMA tests.Results A total of 148 hospitals or departments participated and multiple testing methods were adopted.The accurate rate of ANA(97.3％),AMA (96.1％),ASMA (92.1％) and anti-CCP (97.4％) were higher than that of anti-dsDNA (81.9％) and anti-ENA (77.2％).Anti-RNP and anti-Scl70 in anti-ENAs had the lower accurate rate,90.9％ and 80.3％ respectively.Taking data of the past 10 years together,the accuracy of antiSSA,anti-SSB,anti-Sm had been stable since 2009,while that of anti-RNP and anti-Scl70 decreased slightly.For methodology,indirect immunofluorescence was mainly adopted in the testing of ANA,anti-dsDNA,AMA and ASMA,immunoblotting was mainly adopted in anti-ENA detection and enzyme linked immunosorbent serologic assay was used for anti-CCP test.Conclusion No major variation of primary testing method is found in recent 10 years.Although diverged greatly among different methods,the accuracy of antibody detection has improved year by year.
