Clinical analysis of 51 choledocholithiasis patients combined with juxtapapillary duodenal diverticular treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2014.04.008
- VernacularTitle:内镜乳头括约肌切开术治疗合并乳头旁憩室的胆总管结石51例临床分析
- Author:
Chunhua FANG
;
Shaoping LIU
;
Yahua HU
;
Xiaolan HU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Choledocholithiasis;
Juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum;
Endoscopic sphincterotomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2014;37(4):26-29
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the relationship between juxtapapillary duodenal diverticular (JPDD) and choledocholithiasis,and the effects of JPDD on endoscopic sphinctemtomy(EST) in treatment of choledocholithiasis.Methods Fifty-one cases of choledocholithiasis combined with JPDD (choledocholithiasis combined with JPDD group) and 210 cases of choledocholithiasis without JPDD (choledocholithiasis without JPDD group) were treated by EST,and the clinical data of patients in the two groups were retrospectively analyzed.The relationship between JPDD and choledocholithiasis was studied.The JPDD' influence on the intubation success rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP),the success rate of the stone removal by EST and complication were analyzed.Results The incidences of choledocholithiasis in patients of JPDD diameter ＜ 1 cm,1-3 cm and ＞ 3 cm were 39.3％(11/28),53.2％ (33/62) and 7/8 respectively.The larger the JPDD diameter,the higher the incidence of choledocholithiasis,and there was statistical difference (P ＜ 0.01).The incidence of choledocholithiasis in peripheral type JPDD was significantly higher than that in parallel type and circumvolution type [81.0％(17/21) vs.41.9％(26/62) and 8/15],and there were statistical differences (P ＜0.05).There was no statistical difference in the intubation success rate of ERCP between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05),but the success rate of the stone removal by EST in choledocholithiasis combined with JPDD group was significantly lower than that in choledocholithiasis without JPDD group [91.8％ (45/49) vs.99.5％ (208/209)].The incidence of EST incision bleeding was significantly higher than that in choledocholithiasis without JPDD group [11.1％ (5/45) vs.1.9％ (4/208)],and there was statistical difference (P ＜ 0.01) ; there were statistical differences in the incidences of others complication between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that JPDD was independent risk factor for EST incision bleeding (P =0.043).Conclusions JPDD is relative with choledocholithiasis.JPDD makes EST a little more difficult and risky,while EST is still a safe and effective therapy for choledocholithiasis patients combined with JPDD.
