A meta-analysis to compare LC +LCBDE with ERCP+LC for patients with concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-8118.2013.10.009
- VernacularTitle:胆囊结石合并胆总管结石两种微创术式比较的Meta分析
- Author:
Chaobo CHEN
;
Yudong QIU
;
Yanyan GU
;
Hao CAI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cholelithiasis;
Cholecystectomy,laparoscopic;
Cholangiopancreatography;
Endoscopic retrograde;
Meta analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
2013;19(10):752-757
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the safety and efficiency of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) /endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) +LC for patients with concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones.Methods The Pubmed,EMBASE and CNKI were searched for randomized controlled trials published from 1990 to March,2012.Revman 5.1 was used to perform the meta-analysis.The main outcomes were stone clearance rate,treatment morbidity,operative time and length of hospital stay.Results 9 studies with 1021 patients were included into the final analysis.Meta-analysis demonstrated that LC+LCBDE was similar to ERCP/EST+LC in the stone clearance rate (OR 1.55,95％CI 0.95～2.52,P=0.08),treatment morbidity (OR 1.12,95％CI 0.75～1.67,P=0.58),operative time (WMD-54.44,95％CI-107.7～-1.17,P=0.05) and length of hospital stay (WMD-0.22,95％CI-2.6～2.16,P=0.86).The P value of the stone clearance rate was approaching 0.05 with increased number of studies in the analysis.There was no significant difference in the operative time,probably because of small sample size.Conclusions LC-LCBDE was equivalent to ERCP/EST+ LC in stone clearance rate,treatment morbidity,operative time and length of hospital stay.There is a possibility that LC+LCBDE can be superior to ERCP/EST+LC in the stone clearance rate and the operative time with increase in sample size.
