Wear, microleakage and plastic deformation of an implant-supported chair-side bar system.
- Author:
Christian Johannes MEHL
1
;
Martin STEINER
;
Klaus LUDWIG
;
Matthias KERN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: SFI-Bar; Retention; Microleakage; Cyclic long-term loading; Chewing simulator; Implant
- MeSH: Female; Humans; Mastication; Plastics*; Silicones
- From:The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2015;7(4):323-328
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: This in-vitro study was designed to evaluate retention forces, microleakage and plastic deformation of a prefabricated 2-implant bar attachment system (SFI-Bar, Cendres+Metaux, Switzerland). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two SFI implant-adapters were torqued with 35 Ncm into two implant analogues. Before the tube bars were finally sealed, the inner cavity of the tube bar was filled with liquid red dye to evaluate microleakage. As tube bar sealing agents three different materials were used (AGC Cem (AGC, resin based), Cervitec Plus (CP; varnish) and Gapseal (GS; silicone based). Four groups with eight specimens each were tested (GS, GS+AGC, AGC, CP). For cyclic loading, the attachment system was assembled parallel to the female counterparts in a chewing simulator. The mean retention forces of the initial and final ten cycles were statistically evaluated (ANOVA, alpha< or =.05). RESULTS: All groups showed a significant loss of retention forces. Their means differed between 30-39 N initially and 22-28 N after 50,000 loading cycles. No significant statistical differences could be found between the groups at the beginning (P=.224), at the end (P=.257) or between the loss of retention forces (P=.288). Microleakage occurred initially only in some groups but after 10,000 loading cycles all groups exhibited microleakage. CONCLUSION: Long-term retention forces of the SFI-Bar remained above 20 N which can be considered clinically sufficient. The sealing agents in this study are not suitable to prevent microleakage.
