Incidence of Detrusor Underactivity in Men with Prostatism Older than 50 years.
- Author:
Jeong Gu LEE
1
;
Kang Soo SHIM
;
Sung Kun KOH
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Benign prostatic hyperplasia;
Detrusor underactivity;
Pressure-flow study
- MeSH:
Digital Rectal Examination;
Humans;
Incidence*;
Male;
Prostate;
Prostatic Hyperplasia;
Prostatism*;
Urinary Bladder;
Urodynamics
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1999;40(3):347-352
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: It has been well known that 70-80% of men with prostatism actually manifest bladder outlet obstruction(BOO) and the rest have detrusor underactivity(DU) or other abnormalities. Accordingly, the treatment of BPH by the results of symptom score, or uroflow may be partly incorrect. It is also well known that the pressure-flow study is the gold-standard to define the presence and degree of BOO. Therefore, we investigated pressure-flow study to identify non-obstructed, underactive detrusor function among the patients presented with prostatism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 96 patients older than 50 years (mean 69.6+/-5.8) with prostatism. All patients were assessed by history taking, symptom score, digital rectal examination, uroflowmetry and pressure-flow study. Patients were divided into irritative and obstructive symptom groups according to their chief complaints. Urodynamic parameters between those two groups were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Of the total 96 patients, detrusor instability was noted in 45(47%) at the filling cystometry. Of the 53 patients presented with irritative symptoms, 33 showed detrusor instability(62%); Of the 43 patients mainly presented with obstructive symptoms, only 12(28%) showed detrusor instability. Statistically significant correlation was found between irritative symptoms and detrusor instability as well as obstructed symptoms and BOO. In the total patients, BOO was found in 49(51%) and detrusor underactivity(DU) was found in 36(37%) with equivocal cases in 11(12%). Of the 43 patients mainly presented with obstructive symptoms, BOO and DU was found in 23(53%) and 13(30%) respectively. Of the 53 patients presented with irritative symptoms, BOO and DU was found in 26(49%) and 23(43%) respectively. There were no significant differences between irritative and obstructive symptom group as well as BOO and DU group in the clinical parameters as determined by symptom score, prostate size, and uroflowmetry. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, significant proportion(37%) of the whole patient population was classified as detrusor underactivity as diagnosed by urodynamics to which treatment for BPH may not be as effective as for those manifested with BOO. It is suggested that pressure-flow study is to be considered to patients with prostatism who didn`t show any symptomatic improvement despite the treatment for BPH.
