Reliability and validity of Connor-Davidson resilience scale in Chinese college students
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2013.11.026
- VernacularTitle:Connor-Davidson心理复原力量表中文版在大学生中的信效度分析
- Author:
Yu CHEN
;
Yueyi SUN
;
Tao PEI
;
Ning ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Chinese revision of connor-davidson resilience scale;
College students;
Reliability;
Validity
- From:
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
2013;22(11):1040-1043
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To examine the reliability and validity of Chinese revision of connor-davidson resilience scale(CD-RISC) in Chinese college students.Methods 1610 college students were tested with CD-RISC.783 of them took a more test by BFI and SCL-90 at the same time.After three weeks,83 students were retested by CD-RISC.Results (1) The results of confirmatory factor analysis (x2/df =6.632,RMSEA =0.059,GFI =0.934,AGFI =0.915,CFI =0.927,NFI =0.915) indicated that the three-factor model reasonably fitted Chinese college students.(2) The Cronabach α coefficients of the CD-RISC and three factors called adaptability,tenacity and autonomy were 0.914,0.865,0.784,0.767 respectively; the mean inter-item correlation coefficients of them were 0.364,0.417,0.425,0.398 respectively; the Guttman split-half coefficients were 0.888,0.843,0.707,0.650 respectively; the retest-reliability coefficients were 0.856,0.742,0.777,0.747.(3) The scores of the total scale of CDRISC and three factors were significantly correlated to BFI and SCL-90(P＜0.01).There were significant differences between the low-resilient group and the high-resilient group in every index of BFI and SCL-90.(4) There were significant differences between male and female students in CD-RISC and factor tenacity and autonomy(male:2.77±0.60,2.70-±0.74,2.65±0.68;female:Z70±0.53,2.62±0.67,2.54±0.62; P＜0.05).Conclusion The Chinese version of CD-RISC is a reliable and valid method for assessing resilience in Chinese college students.
