Therapeutic effect compared between laparoscope and open neoplasty of gastroduodenal ulcer perforated
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2013.35.013
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜和开腹胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术的疗效比较
- Author:
Gang ZHENG
;
Defa REN
;
Zhaoxia GAO
;
Han HU
;
Changjiang LEI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Peptic ulcer perforation;
Laparoscopes;
Treatment outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2013;36(35):39-41
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the safety and therapeutic effect between laparoscope and open neoplasty of gastroduodenal ulcer perforated.Methods Among 93 patients with gastroduodenal ulcer perforated,54 patients were given laparoscope neoplasty of gastroduodenal ulcer perforated (laparoscope group),39 patients were given open neoplasty of gastroduodenal ulcer perforated (open group).The informations during the period of operation in the 2 groups were compared.Results There was no death in the 2 groups,2 cases in laparoscope group converted to open operation.The operation time of laparoscope group was significantly longer than that of open group [(74.85 ± 15.80) min vs.(62.97 ± 12.14) min],there was statistical difference (P ＜ 0.01).There were no statistical differences in the time of postoperative indwelling gastric tube,hospitalization time and complication rate between the 2 groups (P ＞ 0.05).The rate of postoperative analgesia of laparoscope group was significantly lower than that of open group [20.4％ (11/54) vs.74.4％ (29/39)],there was statistical difference (P ＜ 0.01).Conclusion Laparoscope neoplasty of gastroduodenal ulcer perforated is effective and safe,and has high application value.
