Comparative research of the clinical effects of treating subcutaneous effusion after spinal operation in different methods
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2013.35.017
- VernacularTitle:不同方法治疗脊柱术后皮下积液的疗效比较
- Author:
Chao HE
;
Yu YU
;
Minghua ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
spinal injuries;
subcutaneous effusion;
negative-pressure wound therapy;
comp study
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2013;(35):4277-4278
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effects of vacuum sealing drainage and traditional method on subcutaneous effusion after spinal operation .Methods From June 2009 to June 2011 ,52 cases were randomly divided into 2 groups:group A(treat with vacuum sealing drainage) and group B(treat with traditional method ) .Comparing the cure rate ,wound healing time ,infection rete and satisfaction rate between two groups .Results All cured cases were followed up for 3 months ,all wounds achieved primary healing postoperatively ,and without recurrence .The cure rate was 92 .31% (24/26)in group A ,there was statistically significant difference compared with group B[69 .23% (18/26)](χ2 =4 .457 ,P<0 .05) .The wound healing time was(12 .13 ± 1 .39) d in group A ,and(17 .72 ± 1 .78) d in group B ,which showed statistically significant difference between two groups (t=11 .455 ,P<0 .05) . The satisfaction rate was 84 .62% (22/26)in group A ,and 61 .54% (15/26)in group B ,which showed statistically significant differ-ence between two groups(χ2 =4 .457 ,P<0 .05) .Conclusion The clinical effects of vacuum sealing drainage on subcutaneous effu-sion after spinal operation was obviously superior to traditional method ,and vacuum sealing drainage has advantages such as less pain ,more satisfaction in patients and less workload in medical staff .
