Establishment of a guinea pig model for evaluating the protective effects of new TB vaccines in BCG prime-boost regimen
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5101.2013.12.002
- VernacularTitle:初免加强型结核疫苗保护力评价用动物模型的建立
- Author:
Miao XU
;
Haiqing DENG
;
Baowen CHEN
;
Jinbiao LU
;
Cheng SU
;
Xiaobing SHEN
;
Weixin DU
;
Lei YANG
;
Guozhi WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Tuberculosis;
BCG-prime boost regimen;
Animal model;
Guinea pig;
Recombinant TB vaccine
- From:Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology
2013;(12):893-899
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To establish a suitable guinea pig model for evaluating the protective effects of new TB vaccines in BCG prime-boost regimen .Methods Two different immunization strategies by using the recombinant TB vaccine were employed to boost BCG primed guinea pigs in this study .One was for short-term evaluation with 14 weeks interval between prime and boost immunization and another was for long -term evaluation with 54 weeks interval .In the short-term evaluation group , guinea pigs were boosted twice with the recombinant TB vaccine ( AEC/BC02 ) in every two weeks , while guinea pigs in the long-term evaluation group were boosted for three times with two weeks interval between each injection .A negative con-trol group ( NS→NS) and a BCG control group ( BCG→NS) were both set up in two evaluation groups .One week after the last immunization , all guinea pigs were challenged with M.tuberculosis.Six to seven weeks after bacteria challenge , all animals were euthanized and dissected to evaluate lesion scores of liver , spleen and lung, as well as the viable bacterial load in spleen .Results In the short-term evaluation group , the le-sion scores in those boosted with vaccine (3.33±5.00) was lower than that of BCG control group (5.56± 7.27) (P>0.05) and negative control group (47.00±28.11) (P=0.0001).The difference between BCG control group and negative control group in lesion score was also significant .The animals in vaccine boosted group had lower bacterial loads (0.78±1.55 log10 ) in spleen than that in BCG control group (1.06±1.87) (P>0.05) and negative control group (5.47±0.61) (P=0.0003).In the long-term evaluation group, the lesion score in those boosted with vaccine was lower (5.0±7.6) than that in BCG control group (14.4± 13.5) (P=0.0394) and negative control group (56.9±14.1) (P<0.0001).The animals in vaccine boos-ted group (1.00±1.86 log10) had lower bacterial loads in spleen than that in BCG control group (1.46± 1.94) (P>0.05) and negative control group (5.43±0.56) (P=0.01).There was a significant difference in bacterial load between BCG control group and negative group (P=0.0089).Conclusion The results suggest that the interval time between BCG-prime and boost immunization should be properly prolonged in the guinea pig model used for evaluating the protective effects of new TB vaccines in BCG prime -boost regimen .
