Academic level of papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics and methodology they used
10.3969/j.issn.1671-3982.2013.12.016
- VernacularTitle:发表于《中华儿科杂志》的系统评价／Meta分析的报告质量和方法学质量评价
- Author:
Long GE
;
Yarui LI
;
Qiaoling ZENG
;
Jing WANG
;
Junfeng XU
;
Lu YAO
;
Jinhui TIAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics;
Systematic review;
Meta-analysis;
PRISMA;
AMSTAR;
Evidence-based medicine
- From:Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science
2013;(12):55-60
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To assess the academic level of papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatricsand methodology they used.Methods Basic data were extracted from 13 papers on sys-tematic reviews and meta-analysis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics .The methodology they used was assessed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) and ANSTAR Scale and analyzed using the RevMan5.0.Results The PRISMA score was 14-23.5 (mean 20.0±3.11) and the AMSTAR score was 3-7.5 (mean 6.04±1.38) for the methodology used in papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics .Conclusion The methodology used in papers on systematic reviews and meta-analy-sis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics is not quite valid and should thus be improved .
