The efficacy study of rosuvastatin on treating patients with metabolic syndrome
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2013.12.012
- VernacularTitle:瑞舒伐他汀治疗代谢综合征的效果观察
- Author:
Bo LI
;
Weiwei LIU
;
Jinshan WO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Rosuvastatin;
Atorvastatin;
Metabolic syndrome;
ApoB/ApoA1 ratio;
Inflammation;
Insulin resistance
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2013;29(12):1268-1272
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the efficacy of rosuvastatin on treating patients with metabolic syndrome(MS).Methods Eighty MS patients were divided into rosuvastatin group (n =40) and atorvastatin group(n =40).Patients in rosuvastatin group were received schufftan at dose of 10 mg/d and in atorvastatin group were received lipitor at dose of 10 mg/d orally.Patients were followed-up for 12 weeks.The ratio of apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 (ApoB/ApoA1) and inflammatory factors including high-sensitivity Czreactive protein (hs-CRP),tumor necrosis factor-oα (TNF-α),interleukin-6 (IL-6),and interleukin-18 (IL-18) were measured.Meanwhile Secondary factors:blood lipids,blood glucose,fasting insulin (FIN),insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR),blood pressure,urine albumin excretion rate (UAER),body mass index (BMI).As well as safety indicators:hepatic and renal function and creatine kinase (CK) were detected.Results (1) After 12-week's treatment,the serum levels of ApoB/ApoA1,hs-CRP,TNF-α,IL-6,IL-18,ApoB,total cholesterol (TC),low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C),triglyceride (TG),FIN,HOMA-IR,systolic blood pressure (SBP),diastolic blood pressure (DBP),and UAER significantly decreased compared to before treatment in the two groups(rosuvastatin group:1.26 ± 0.25 vs.0.63 ± 0.22,t =4.44 ; (6.89 ± 1.43) mg/L vs.(2.41 ± 0.36) mg/L,t =7.12;(27.63 ±7.12) ng/L vs.(12.98 ±3.74) ng/L,t =4.23;(26.47 ±6.59) ng/L vs.(13.16± 3.55) ng/L,t =4.45;(318.36 ±90.45) ng/L vs.(172.77 ±50.65) ng/L,t =3.92;(1.58 ±0.29) g/L vs.(0.83 ± 0.23) g/L,t =4.20; (5.78 ± 0.86) mmol/L vs.(3.53 ± 0.69) mmol/L,t =3.85 ; (3.52 ± 0.54) mmol/L vs.(2.04±0.49) mmol/L,t =3.89;(2.87 ±0.65) mmol/L vs.(1.91 ±0.57) mmol/L,t =3.78; (12.08 ± 2.87) mU/L vs.(6.87 ± 1.89) mU/L,t =3.98 ; 3.42 ± 0.57 vs.1.60 ± 0.31,t =4.65 ; (144.6 ± 13.3) mm Hg vs.(135.1 ±12.7) mm Hg,t =3.57;(93.6 ±9.5) mm Hg vs.(85.2 ±7.6) mm Hg,t =3.59; (29.86 ± 3.37) μg/min vs.(22.52 ± 2.56) μg/min,t =3.71 ; atorvastatin group:1.24 ± 0.23 vs.0.92 ± 0.24,t =3.74 ; (6.84 ± 1.37) mg/L vs.(3.50 ± 0.75) mg/L,t =4.24 ; (27.22 ± 7.36) ng/L vs.(18.70 ± 5.82) ng/L,t =3.76; (26.28 ±6.84) ng/L vs.(19.34 ± 5.96) ng/L,t =3.75 ; (311.22 ±91.98) ng/L vs.(246.50±74.73) ng/L,t=3.63;(1.56±0.27) g/L vs.(1.14±0.26) g/L,t =3.74;(5.65 ±0.76) mmol/L vs.(4.67±0.65) mmol/L,t =3.68;(3.51 ±0.55) mmol/L vs.(2.65 ±0.57) mmol/L,t =3.70; (2.86±0.68) mmol/Lvs.(2.05 ±0.54) mmol/L,t=3.78;(12.04±2.95) mU/L vs.(8.91 ±2.32) mU/L,t =3.74;3.38 ±0.54 vs.2.18 ±0.35,t =3.80;(144.0 ± 13.8) mm Hg vs.(135.7 ±12.5) mm Hg,t =3.56 ; (93.4 ± 9.3) mm Hg vs.(85.8 ± 8.9) mm Hg,t =3.58 ; (29.77 ± 3.28) μg/min vs.(23.02 ± 2.83) μg/min,t =3.67 ;P ＜ 0.01).ApoA1 and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) had increase,but there was no significant difference(P ＞ 0.05).Fasting plasma glucose(FPG),2 h postprandial blood glucose (2 hPG) and BMI tended to decrease,but there were no significant differences(P ＞ 0.05).(2)The serum levels of ApoB/ApoA1,hs-CRP,TNF-α,IL-6,IL-18,ApoB,TC,LDL-C,FIN and HOMA-IR in the rosuvastatin group were significantly lower than those in the atorvastatin group at the 12th-week follow-up(t =2.11,2.10,2.09,2.12,2.08,2.07,2.05,2.04,2.04,2.06 respectively; P ＜ 0.05).The serum levels of HDL-C and ApoA1 in the rosuvastatin group tended to increase compared with the atorvastatin group after 12-week treatment (P ＞ 0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in term of TG,SBP,DBP,UAER between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).(3) The adverse effect in the rosuvastatin group was fewer than that in atorvastatin group.Conclusion Rosuvastatin can reduce ApoB/ApoA1 ratio and the levels of inflammatory cytokines,improve insulin resistance in patients with MS and less adverse effect were seen.
