Prevalence of High-Riding Vertebral Artery and Morphometry of C2 Pedicles Using a Novel Computed Tomography Reconstruction Technique.
10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1141
- Author:
Wiwat WAJANAVISIT
1
;
Thamrong LERTUDOMPHONWANIT
;
Praman FUANGFA
;
Pongsthorn CHANPLAKORN
;
Chaiwat KRAIWATTANAPONG
;
Supaneewan JAOVISIDHA
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. thamrong.lert@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Comparative Study ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Vertebral artery;
High-riding vertebral artery;
Pedicle;
X-ray computed tomography;
C2 screw
- MeSH:
Humans;
Methods;
Pedicle Screws;
Prevalence*;
Spine;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed;
Vertebral Artery*
- From:Asian Spine Journal
2016;10(6):1141-1148
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, matched-pair comparative study. PURPOSE: To determine whether a thin-sliced pedicular-oriented computed tomography (TPCT) scan reconstructed from an existing conventional computed tomography (CCT) scan is more accurate for identifying vertebral artery groove (VAG) anomalies than CCT. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation and C2 pedicle screws can cause vertebral artery (VA) injury. Two anatomic variations of VAG anomalies are associated with VA injury: a high-riding VA (HRVA) and a narrow pedicle of the C2 vertebra. CCT scan is a reliable method used to evaluate VAG anomalies; however, its accuracy level remains debatable. Literature comparing the prevalence of C2 VAG anomalies between CCT and TPCT is limited. METHODS: A total of 200 computed tomography scans of the upper cervical spine obtained between January 2008 and December 2011 were evaluated for C2 VAG anomalies (HRVA and narrow pedicular width) using CCT and TPCT. The prevalence of C2 VAG anomalies was compared using these two different measurement methods via a McNemar's test. RESULTS: Of the 200 patients studied, 23 HRVA (6.01%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.61%–8.39%) were detected with CCT, whereas 66 HRVA (16.54%; 95% CI, 12.85%–20.23%) were detected with TPCT (p<0.001). Sixty-two narrow pedicles (15.58%; 95% CI, 11.99%–19.15%) were detected with CCT, whereas 90 narrow pedicles (22.83%; 95% CI, 18.58%–26.87%) were detected with TPCT (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: VAG anomalies are commonly observed. A preoperative evaluation using TPCT reconstructed from an existing CCT revealed a significantly higher prevalence of C2 VAG anomalies than did CCT and showed comparable prevalence to previously published studies using more sophisticated and higher risk techniques. Therefore, we propose TPCT as an alternative preoperative evaluation for C2 screw placement and trajectory planning.
