Comparison of Cyberwand dual probe lithotriptor and Swiss lithoclast master in ultrasonically guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal staghorn calculi
10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2013.08.016
- VernacularTitle:B超引导下经皮肾镜双导管碎石术与气压弹道联合超声碎石术治疗鹿角形肾结石的疗效比较
- Author:
Yang LI
;
Feng ZENG
;
Zhongqing YANG
;
Hequn CHEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cyberwand dual probe lithotriptor;
Swiss lithoclast master;
renal staghorn calculi
- From:
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences)
2013;38(8):853-856
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate and compare the effciency and safety of Cyberwand dual probe lithotriptor and Swiss lithoclast master in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal staghorn calculi.
Methods:A total of 138 patients with renal staghorn calculi were divided randomly into a Cyberwand dual probe lithotripter group (Group A, n=71) and a Swiss lithoclast master group(Group B, n=67). hTe data for operative time, blood loss volume, one-stage calculus clearance rate, hospitalization time, cost of hospitalization and complication in the two groups were collected and compared.
Results: The renal access was established successfully and the one-stage percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was performed in the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the size of stones, the age of patients and the complications between the 2 groups before the operations. Intraoperative gravel time in the Group A was signiifcantly shorter than that in the Group B (77.14±21.39 vs 84.25±20.62, P=0.049). There was no significant difference in the one-staged stone clearance rate, blood loss volume in the operation between the 2 groups. hTe one-staged stone clearance rate in the 2 groups were 67.6%(48/71) and 70.1%(47/67) respectively, with no signiifcant difference (P=0.854).
Conclusion:Two lithotrities were safe and effcient for renal staghorn calculi. But comparing with Swiss lithoclast master, Cyberwand dual probe lithotriptor is more effcient and convenient.
