Comparison of two methods of transurethral surgical treatment for small size prostatic hyperplasia
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2013.21.008
- VernacularTitle:两种术式经尿道手术治疗小体积前列腺增生的比较
- Author:
Nan LIU
;
Yuan LI
;
Hong LUO
;
Junyong DAI
;
Peng XIAN
;
Yanping SONG
;
Jiankang PENG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
prostatic hyperplasia;
transurethral resection of prostate;
transurethral incision of the bladder neck
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2013;(21):2463-2465
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effect of transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and TURP combine with transure-thral incision of the bladder neck(TUIBN) in the treatment of small size prostate hyperplasia .Methods From March 2002 to Octo-ber 2010 ,124 cases of small-size prostate hyperplasia patients were treated .All patients were randomized to undergo TURP or TURP with TUIBN .There were 62 patients in TURP group .Of which ,54 cases were followed up .There were 62 patients in TURP plus TUIBN group .Of which ,50 cases were followed up .The treatment effect of the two different surgical methods was evaluated by comparing international prostate symptom (IPSS) ,maximum flow rate(Qmax) and post voiding residual urine volume(PVR) et al .Results No statistical difference (P>0 .05)was found in age ,medical histories ,prostatic weight ,IPSS ,Qmax ,PVR between the two groups before operation .But significant difference(P<0 .01)was observed in IPSS ,Qmax ,PVR between the two groups after operation .There was no statistical difference(P>0 .05) in resected tissue weight and follow up between the two groups .The inci-dence rate of bladder neck contracture was 4% in TURP plus TUIBN group ,and it was significantly lower than that of TURP group(11% )(P< 0 .01) .Conclusion TURP plus TUIBN was better for the treatment of small size prostatic hyperplasia than TURP .
