Patient Simulation: A Literary Synthesis of Assessment Tools in Anesthesiology.
- Author:
Alice A EDLER
1
;
Ruth G FANNING
;
Michael I CHEN
;
Rebecca CLAURE
;
Dondee ALMAZAN
;
Brain STRUYK
;
Samuel C SEIDEN
Author Information
1. Department of Graduate Medical Education, Stanford Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, CA. edlera@aol.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
High-Fidelity Patient Simulation;
Anesthesiology;
Patient Simulation;
Performance Assessment;
Systemic Review;
Test Theory
- MeSH:
Anesthesiology;
Humans;
Patient Simulation;
Reproducibility of Results;
Research Personnel
- From:Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
2009;6(1):3-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
High-fidelity patient simulation (HFPS) has been hypothesized as a modality for assessing competency of knowledge and skill in patient simulation, but uniform methods for HFPS performance assessment (PA) have not yet been completely achieved. Anesthesiology as a field founded the HFPS discipline and also leads in its PA. This project reviews the types, quality, and designated purpose of HFPS PA tools in anesthesiology. We used the systematic review method and systematically reviewed anesthesiology literature referenced in PubMed to assess the quality and reliability of available PA tools in HFPS. Of 412 articles identified, 50 met our inclusion criteria. Seventy seven percent of studies have been published since 2000; more recent studies demonstrated higher quality. Investigators reported a variety of test construction and validation methods. The most commonly reported test construction methods included "modified Delphi Techniques" for item selection, reliability measurement using inter-rater agreement, and intra-class correlations between test items or subtests. Modern test theory, in particular generalizability theory, was used in nine (18%) of studies. Test score validity has been addressed in multiple investigations and shown a significant improvement in reporting accuracy. However the assessment of predicative has been low across the majority of studies. Usability and practicality of testing occasions and tools was only anecdotally reported. To more completely comply with the gold standards for PA design, both shared experience of experts and recognition of test construction standards, including reliability and validity measurements, instrument piloting, rater training, and explicit identification of the purpose and proposed use of the assessment tool, are required.
