Comprehensive evaluation of intramedullary fixation and extramedullary fixation in the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.35.006
- VernacularTitle:髓内与髓外系统骨钉置入治疗不稳定股骨转子间骨折的综合效果评价
- Author:
Yan LI
;
Dong WANG
;
Haiyu SUN
;
Liang LIU
;
Shuwei LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
bone and joint implants;
orthopedic implants;
femoral intertrochanteric fractures;
intramedul ary fixation system;
unstable fractures;
effective evaluation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2013;(35):6254-6260
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Nowadays, the internal fixation materials for the clinical treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures are broadly divided into two categories:intramedul ary fixation system and
extramedul ary fixation system. However, the effects of the treatments usual y lack of macro evaluation.
OBJECTIVE:To compare the effect of intramedul ary fixation system and extramedul ary internal fixation system in the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.
METHODS:217 patients with unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture (Evans typing: Ⅲ type to Ⅴ type and R type) were treated by using intramedul ary fixation system and extramedul ary internal fixation system:18
cases were treated with dynamic condylar screw, 67 cases were treated with dynamic hip screw, 43 cases were treated with reconstruction nail, 72 cases were treated with proximal femoral anti-rotation blade nail, and 17 cases were treated with new generation of antegrade interlocking intramedul ary nail. The operative time, length of
incision, blood loss, time in bed, fracture healing time, complications and Harris hip score were analyzed and compared.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:In the aspects of operative time, blood loss, time in bed, complications and
Harris hip score, the intramedul ary fixation system was superior to extramedul ary internal fixation system. But there were significant differences in the aspects of length of incision and fracture healing time between two
methods. The results showed that the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures by using
intramedul ary fixation system was better than the extramedul ary internal fixation system, as the intramedul ary fixation system could effectively shorten the operative time and reduce blood loss. This stable and reliable fixation enables patients to take early postoperative functional exercise, and could significantly shorten the time in bed and reduce the incidence of complications and it is conducive to postoperative hip function recovery.
Therefore, intramedul ary fixation system is an ideal method for the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.
