Comparison of the effect of three internal fixation methods in the treatment of femoral interochanteric fractures
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2013.18.020
- VernacularTitle:三种内固定方法治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较
- Author:
Junping WANG
;
Wenkun BAI
;
Jiangfa XU
;
Mu LU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Femur;
Fractures,internal fixation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2013;20(18):2770-2772
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the clinical effects of three nail and plate systems in treating femoral intertrochanteric fracture.Methods The clinical data of 75 patients with femoral interochanteric fiactures treated by internal fixation were analyzed.According to different treatment methods,75 patients were divided into three groups:DHS group(treated with dynamic hip screw) 26 cases,PFN group(treated with proximal femoral nail) 15 cases,LCP group (treated with anatomical proximal femoral locking plate) 34 cases.Fracture union time,complications and hip function scores according to Harris's scoring were recorded.Results All patients were followed up for 18 to 36 months.Four patients appeared coax vara in DHS group and one case appeared coax vara in PFN group,three case appeared coax vara in anatomical proximal femoral locking plate (LCP.) There was no significant difference in fracture union time and the excellent and good rate of hip function scores among the three groups (F =2.25,χ2 =0.032,all P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion The effects of three nail and plate systems in treating femoral intertrochanteric fracture is similar,but they have their own characteristics and indications.And the reasonable treatment should be selected according to different fracture types.
